Although, being only "meh" at best on the series, my own take would be that the ending change there was value neutral, especially if you're just considering the movie on its own.
HEY! Those are some extremely good-looking people you'd be putting out of work!
And Jessica cuts right to the heart of the issue.
I'm not saying they're not very pretty.... I can appreciate that much about the show.
And it gave RDA something to wash the MacGuyver mullett out of everybody's brains.
I can't think of a single instance that I've heard of and know some of the details about where a test audience brought about an improved product.
That's not usually the goal, though.
I will bet money that lots of bad movies would be even worse without test audiences. But nobody cares, because even improved, they're still bad movies. That kind of process is going to tend to make bad things better, and good things worse.
Do Uwe Boll movies have test audiences? Because if there are movies out there that are worse than the versions of his movies that make it to the theaters, we should all Be Very Afraid.
Oh, oh! Yes, they do, and I hope those poor people got paid. Because originally Alone in the Dark had a different ending, and somehow that led to them adding captions or something that completely contradicted the visuals. And they added that extraordinarily long crawl at the beginning because when they tested it the first time, nobody understood what the hell was going on.
I don't think the crawl helped, really. But it did make the movie even funnier, so that's kind of an improvement.
I'm still holding a grudge against the test audience members who audibly gasped at Ralph Fiennes nude scenes at the end of Red Dragon. It was them that got some of the scenes...um...snipped.
Eh...I tend to assume that any reports of "we had to cut this scene because X's penis is too frighteningly large" are urban legends, until someone produces pictures to prove me wrong.
.
.
.
I'm waiting...
But I believe test audiences prefered getting the rich guy in the end.
I heard that Molly Ringwald pushed for the non-Ducky ending. I'm sure I read that in an interview when it came out.
Or, once again, I could be making shit up.
I heard that Molly Ringwald pushed for the non-Ducky ending. I'm sure I read that in an interview when it came out.
No, I heard the same thing. And that
Some Kind of Wonderful
was made to essentially right the PiP ending.