I've now watched P&P three times (once with the director's commentary). All in all, I liked it for the acting, the costumes and the set. But I think that it's technically an inferior effort--the sound sucks, the editing seemed weird to me when I found out that the director hated letters (even though the letters provide a lot of exposition for the book and the film versions I've seen).
'Heart Of Gold'
Buffista Movies 5: Development Hell
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
the director hated letters
Dude -- the guy hates letters and Regency dress? Why exactly did he want to make this movie?
The chance to work with a cast consisting largely of five pretty young girls?
Surely he could have opted for Coyote Ugly 2 or somesuch?
The chance to tell a great story?
(I hate letters, too. They don't strike anybody else as cheap expository techniques?)
They don't strike anybody else as cheap expository techniques?
Have you read Pride and Prejudice?
Have you read Pride and Prejudice?
Hey, who says Jane's cheap-proof.
Hey, who says Jane's cheap-proof.
Them's fightin' words...
(By which I mean that's my favorite scene in one of my favorite books, and I really really really didn't like the new film version so there. t pout )
I love Pride and Prejudice as written. Just wanted to point out that if you think letters are cheap, no reason to think they're not cheap in Jane's hands too.
Just wanted to point out that if you think letters are cheap, no reason to think they're not cheap in Jane's hands too.
Then he should leave the Jane-adapting to people better suited to it.
rassenfrassenkierafuckingknightlycakes