An AI with independent learning capabilities could easily learn a value system that's not actively hostile to humans, but still problematic. Like, TrafficAI decides one day that red lights don't really do anyone any good, and it's not going to use them anymore. Or GoogleAI and YahooAI get into a long drawn-out argument, and nobody can look anything up online for hours. And suchlike.

but there's no reason for our priorities to be machine priorities. Worried about pollution? Kill most of the humans.

OK, I'm venturing further out into conjecture-land, but I think that by the time we get to autonomous commercial AI programs (for example, one that processes insurance claims) that these sort of straightforward AI applications will be well-understood, with clearly-defined limits. For example, an AI that's allowed to access the internet would be forced to abide by correct internet protocols, and would be prohibited from hacking into other computers. And I think we'd be able to understand such programs well enough that we could be sure it was impossible for such a thing to even occur to the AI.

OK, maybe that's rather optimistic of me. But like I said before, an AI that's designed to infiltrate, attack, strategize, take over systems, etc. - I'd be afraid of those. Plus they'd tend to be top-secret, with perhaps little oversight....

The idea of curling up on my cuddle lounge and watching something on TiVo or listening to my iPod while I wirelessly surf the web on my Powerbook while Roomba scoots around and does my vacuuming...hot.

Agreed, but I intend to be watching a movie or surfing the web on Mr. Jane's PSP, or watching something I downloaded on the pod.

I'm quite expert at believing two contradictory things at once. They better not make computers that can do that too.

I think Douglas Adams already thought this one up. It was an electric monk. Of course it turned murderous.

The idea of curling up on my cuddle lounge and watching something on TiVo or listening to my iPod while I wirelessly surf the web on my Powerbook while Roomba scoots around and does my vacuuming...hot.

AIFG

Damn this waiting around until the kids are old enough to be useful as manual domestic labor... I think I have at least 4 years to wait.

Ha hah aha ha ha ha ha ha aha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

flea, mine are 15 and 12 and they haven't learned to mop. I so fail as a mother.

I'm twenty-nine and the first mother-child spat of my recent visit home (hey, there were only two total) was over floor-mopping, which I did not do adequately.

MOM, LATER: I never taught you to mop a floor, did I?
ME: Not really. I did attend an Ivy League college, though.
MOM, SADLY: Well, there's that.

My mom and I have had that same discussion- not really a spat, but I was telling her that I bought a book on housekeeping. She was all apologetic that she hadn't taught me that, and I told her that she taught me how to read and look something up when I didn't know it, so it all worked out.

Timelies all!

I don't want to think about how my cat would react to either a Roomba or a Sccoba. Oh, wait. She'd just hide under the bed, since that's her default reaction to new stuff.

I really would rather not be doing the barcoding I'm doing.

People should entertain me instead.

She was all apologetic that she hadn't taught me that, and I told her that she taught me how to read and look something up when I didn't know it, so it all worked out.

That's awesome.