Here's the link to the about the DARPA contest (the self-driving vehicles):
Stanford won it.
Xander ,'Showtime'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
But not as much as the robo-raptors, which I would like to purchase and pit against the Roomba in battle
They'll team up and turn on you. iiiViva la robolucione!!!
MIT has those skittery buglike robots. And the little round ones that can distinguish between "self" and "other" and learn from the others.
I can't make the picture enlarge, but #49 looks like something that would kill me in my sleep. Fuzzy != cute!
[eta: Oh, I see -- you just have to click the thumbnail and scroll down.]
Here's the story about the self-aware robots.
Leonardo's a gremlin! Whose bright idea was that?
So much reading to do!
Do you guys require your AI to look human? I don't think I need a face. In fact, a face is pushing the uncanny valley territory. Speak English, sure. Indicate moods, etc, but faces is nothing I need right now.
My sister and I got each other the same thing for Christmas.
I don't think I need a face. In fact, a face is pushing the uncanny valley territory. Speak English, sure. Indicate moods, etc, but faces is nothing I need right now.
Yeah, I don't really want human faces on my robots. I want communication skills sans uncanny valley. Robots should look like Bender, and intelligent computers should look like HAL.
I saw Letterman's clip. Too bad there were O'Reilly fans in the audience. O'Reilly has to be one of the main media people I absolutely cannot stand. I also can't stand that damn woman on CNN Headline News who is in love with her own image.
I want a robot that's a big rolling ball that has doors that flip open and task appropriate arms come out. Or legs, to navigate tricky terrain. And it can have speakers, and its whole surface will be e-paper.
I don't know what I want it to do yet, but I suspect there's no rush.