Hmm. 'Surprising' may not be what I should go for in this case....
Sigh. Okay how about this....
The conclusion here is essentially a paradigmatic prospective assemblage intended to render a dynamic orchestration of employee energistics across multiple vertices. Through a system of non-apparent motive vehicles, we will seek to initiate from within the disintegrated participatory constituents an innovated focus-drive generating a core-gravity that will channel exertory critical impulses along complementary and bi-reflexive vortals.
So, anyone want to write the conclusion of my paper for me?
Despite [counter-argument you don't feel like dealing with at this point], the [list of examples from paper] suggest [something which is related to, or sounds like, your thesis]. [Joke to distract anyone from the flimsy connection between what you just said and your original thesis]. [Topic sentence from paper's opening, rewritten with a few synonyms].
OMG Gud, you read my boss' year-end memo!
A completely different link Perkins shouldn't click on.
Is it wrong of me to assume that February is calling January up to invite him over for a nooner?
...Motown and the Beatles and other crappy music.
Tell QPB that the Guinness I gave him years ago just retroactively transubstantiated into O'Doul's in his system.
You are on a roll today, Gud.
God, I wish I could go home now. I'm just starting to twitch about everything I need to do. It'll get done, I just want to START doing it.
Gud just made my head hurt.
In boss gift-giving, I made a scarf for my assistant and also have some chocolate for her. Is that okay? Or would you be offended because it seems cheap?
Really? Not going for HSQ in your paper.
I know, I'm crazy.
The conclusion here is essentially a paradigmatic prospective assemblage intended to render a dynamic orchestration of employee energistics across multiple vertices. Through a system of non-apparent motive vehicles, we will seek to initiate from within the disintegrated participatory constituents an innovated focus-drive generating a core-gravity that will channel exertory critical impulses along complementary and bi-reflexive vortals.
But I think this could actually work!
If I can make a suggestion - I think this is better:
The conclusion here is essentially a paradigmatic prospective assemblage intended to render a dynamic orchestration of employee energistics across multiple vertices. Through a system of non-apparent motive llama llama llama vehicles, we will seek to initiate from within the disintegrated participatory constituents an innovated focus-drive generating a core-gravity that will channel llama llama exertory critical impulses along complementary and bi-reflexive vortals. Llama.
edit for dumb spelling mistake.