9790 page impressions, one click through.
I blame the "Prove that you can click on a moving thing/answer a pop culture question, win something we're obviously not going to give you!" ads. I don't click through on almost any ads. I don't trust them.
Buffy ,'Showtime'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
9790 page impressions, one click through.
I blame the "Prove that you can click on a moving thing/answer a pop culture question, win something we're obviously not going to give you!" ads. I don't click through on almost any ads. I don't trust them.
Oh dear.
I think I want about half the shoes on this page: [link]
And I have a much easier time, well, justifying shoes for Lillian.
This is dangerous.
I think Lillian and Em and Isaac and Ellie and the other various babies we've got hanging out ALL need the flame booties.
That's perfect, ChiKat! Which is probably why it costs a gazillion dollars. But at least I know the stuff exists. Coffee Bean needs to have them in their stores, or maybe Borders/B&N. That's where most of my tealy shopping happens.
I blame the "Prove that you can click on a moving thing/answer a pop culture question, win something we're obviously not going to give you!" ads.
I'm hurt that you think I'd put ads like that up! I'm surprised you think Google would, but I admit I have no idea about their graphical ads. I'm not using any of those.
Speaking of cats, our landlord is apparently claiming she didn't know we had one. This cat has been living there for three years, and overlapped with another cat who had been there for three before.
The gist seems to be that it's okay to disregard atheists and any religion without Moses.
While that's true, the selection is a bit more subtle than that. He's not *ruling* that he wants to permit discrimination against those groups, he's saying that that's already inherently allowed and the 10C case is no different.
It took me several reads of the passage to follow his logic (though I probably would have done better had I followed the link), but this is my interpretation of the steps in his argument:
I'm hurt that you think I'd put ads like that up! I'm surprised you think Google would, but I admit I have no idea about their graphical ads.
By "I blame" I meant I blame the existence of those kinds of ads for people's (or at least my) reluctance to click through on ads in general.
I blame the "Prove that you can click on a moving thing/answer a pop culture question, win something we're obviously not going to give you!" ads. I don't click through on almost any ads. I don't trust them.
I keep accidentally clicking those new ones that expand when you roll over them. I don't roll over them on purpose, I swear!
Well, those and the evil transparent ones with moving parts and difficult-to-find close buttons.
The ones that drift across your screen are appalling.
I get why they need to advertise, really. And why people need to place them. But don't fuck with my ability to see what I came for.
I meant I blame the existence of those kinds of ads for people's (or at least my) reluctance to click through on ads in general.
Ah, sorry. I've clicked through on a few. But the more it moves, the less likely I am to do so, because the more I feel I'm being sold a wack bill of goods.
I fear the cooling fan on my G3 iBook is getting close to failing. If I go to a web page with lots of animated ads, the CPU usage is close to 100%, and if I leave it at a page like that too long, the cooling fan starts up. Then I get mad at the marketing bastards who are threatening damage to my computer.
I s'pose the answer is to get a faster laptop. But... a 900 mhz G3 should be adequate for web browsing.