The above makes me rather skeptical about the rigorous scientific methods employed by the smile researcher.
I never got the impression that this was part of the research. More showing off of what he'd learnt.
Harmony: Somebody remembered to pick me up the sweetest unicorn. Guess someone was feeling guilty for standing me up in tenth grade. Brad: What? Had to get her something. She sired me. Peaches: Sire-whipped.
'Beneath You'
Natter 41: Why Do I Click on ita's Links?!
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Dec 15, 2005 9:49:07 am PST #2333 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Matt the Bruins fan - Dec 15, 2005 9:50:54 am PST #2334 of 10002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Just the fact that he's drawing all these personality traits from people and pairing them up with the way a certain smile looks makes me think he's a candidate for practicing the kind of science that people have been fighting to put in Kansas schools.
beth b - Dec 15, 2005 9:52:54 am PST #2335 of 10002
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!
Oddly, now I am wondering what I shall have for lunch.
and Happy that i will be captureing a buffista on my tv.
§ ita § - Dec 15, 2005 9:54:52 am PST #2336 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
the fact that he's drawing all these personality traits from people and pairing them up with the way a certain smile looks
He's an emotion researcher. It's in the job description.
Allyson - Dec 15, 2005 10:03:54 am PST #2337 of 10002
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
Today is the work xmas party at a nice restaurant. So I wore nice clothes and a sparkly flower in my hair.
And I can't tell if the scientists are making fun of me when they keep saying, "oh! nice flower."
Steph L. - Dec 15, 2005 10:05:05 am PST #2338 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism
and Happy that i will be captureing a buffista on my tv.
My TV listing is telling me that the Jesse Isaac show is on at 7:00. Is that not right?
lori - Dec 15, 2005 10:06:01 am PST #2339 of 10002
I don't think your scientists are capable of that much subtlety. I think they actually mean "nice flower".
Vortex - Dec 15, 2005 10:06:43 am PST #2340 of 10002
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Just the fact that he's drawing all these personality traits from people and pairing them up with the way a certain smile looks makes me think he's a candidate for practicing the kind of science that people have been fighting to put in Kansas schools.
ooh, phrenology!
§ ita § - Dec 15, 2005 10:08:46 am PST #2341 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It freaks me out when guys insist they're not about subtlety, and really it's all about being happy when chicks wear tight clothes.
Which is marginally related to what you said, Allyson, although I believe they meant nice flower. Why not?
It's just off a conversation I was having with a (sorry, got distracted by a cow-orker picking his nose) nice guy yesterday. I don't want to believe that guys are significantly simpler than women--but maybe I'm overstating the complexity of chicks.
sarameg - Dec 15, 2005 10:10:39 am PST #2342 of 10002
I don't think your scientists are capable of that much subtlety.
She beat me to it.