I had to do an above average amount of writing in college (judging from some of my friends' experiences, OMV) and it just never occurred to me to lift someone else's text without clear attribution. It's just something I can't quite wrap my head around. Where's the fun in that? But then, I think finding another way to say something someone else has said is kinda entertaining. I was one of the few students in one of my classes who actually liked doing the one-page synopses of the daily reading assignments. I did get yelled at for blowing out the margins a couple of time. After a few years of artfully padding essays for an annoying teacher in high school, learning to be more concise took some work.
Went to bed early, but didn't sleep well. At one point, the cat was trying to sleep on my head. Not sure if that's a cause or just an observation I was awake to notice.
ita - I noticed that Neil Grayston (Mouthbreather, right?) is in the cast of
Eureka.
It was 0 degrees this morning - woo hoo!
ION, it looks like Condi's speeches in Europe aren't going over entirely well.
[link]
"It's clear that the text of the speech was drafted by lawyers with the intention of misleading an audience," Andrew Tyrie, a Conservative member of Parliament, said in an interview. Mr. Tyrie is chairman of a recently formed nonpartisan committee that plans to investigate claims that the British government has tacitly condoned torture by allowing the United States to use its airspace to transport terrorist suspects to countries where they are subsequently tortured.
Parsing through the speech, Mr. Tyrie pointed out example after example where, he said, Ms. Rice was using surgically precise language to obfuscate and distract. By asserting, for instance, that the United States does not send suspects to countries where they "will be" tortured, Ms. Rice is protecting herself, Mr. Tyrie said, leaving open the possibility that they "may be" tortured in those countries.
Maybe Condi's view is that it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is?
The Kristen invented that word (certainly, she was the first person I saw use it).
Alas, I'm pretty sure squick has a long and distinguished history.
Edit:
The term squick was introduced in the Usenet newsgroup alt.sex.bondage in the early 1990s to refer to an otherwise unremarkable act that crossed someone's personal boundaries in an extreme fashion
[link]
The term squick was introduced in the Usenet newsgroup alt.sex.bondage in the early 1990s to refer to an otherwise unremarkable act that crossed someone's personal boundaries in an extreme fashion
What? Like The Kristen still couldn't have introduced it?
ION, it looks like Condi's speeches in Europe aren't going over entirely well.
Did anyone else read "Condi's" as "Cordi's"?
but that's why they need to be TAUGHT NOT TO DO IT, not just forgiven.
Wait, what? Are you saying the purpose of schooling is to learn stuff you don't already know??
I'd really feel sorry for Cordi if she had to go to Europe to explain our policies on questioning terrorist suspects....
I suspect that Cordy would do a better job of it. But then again, I suspect that the nation would be a whole lot better off if GWB had her as one of the two or three people he talks to.
