> I don't think McDonald's is passing along the savings to me.
ita
Except for the part where if their costs go up, so will yours.
Basic economics - maybe, maybe not. Depends on how much the price would increase, and how much sales would drop in the face of that price increase. Basic economics: additional costs sometimes can be passed on on to customers, in other cases cannot be and have to be taken as hits to profits. If the latter would Mickey D's shut down? Depends on the profit margin.
Your daughter apparates.
Think of it as a bonus feature. And a test of your reflexes.
eta: Dear God, I can't believe that wasn't a massive cross-post.
It's a slow night. We'll be here all week.
Cass, can you get on IM for a sec.?
The man doesn't.
You think I haven't seen the teleporter discussion?
Counting cards isn't even considered cheating. It's not even illegal. Betting is a two-way contract according to the state of Nevada. If the casino doesn't want to bet with you (and they don't, if you're counting cards) they can ask you to leave for any reason.
The house already has an edge. Counting the cards doesn't change the rules of the game--it only increases your own individual odds of winning. You change your betting strategy.
The casinos can't have you arrested for counting cards. They can just throw you out. People get into trouble when they try to come back in after they've been banned.
Betting is a two-way contract according to the state of Nevada.
So kicking out card counters is simply the house saying, "I don't want to gamble with you because you're too good." Same as declining an offer to bet on a game of pool with the local shark. But it's not unethical to count cards.
So kicking out card counters is simply the house saying, "I don't want to gamble with you because you're too good." Same as declining an offer to bet on a game of pool with the local shark. But it's not unethical to count cards.
Counting cards is a skill. I think if it doesn't break the rules, it's not unethical.
Of course, I know some people that think gambling in general is unethical. Or maybe a better term would be immoral?