I think I read The Matchstick Girl once. I got it. I didn't need that again. God, the man was bleak. Didn't they remake that with the Rudy girl?
Harken: You fought with Captain Reynolds in the war? Zoe: Fought with a lot of people in the war. Harken: And your husband? Zoe: Fight with him sometimes, too.
'Bushwhacked'
Natter 40: The Nice One
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2005 8:13:46 am PST #2198 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
juliana - Nov 08, 2005 8:13:57 am PST #2199 of 10006
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…
Linky for The Snow Queen
Sophia Brooks - Nov 08, 2005 8:14:13 am PST #2200 of 10006
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
Didn't they remake that with the Rudy girl?
Yes
Jesse - Nov 08, 2005 8:14:14 am PST #2201 of 10006
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Groupwise (Novell) had a great and completely transparent recall -- if you hadn't read it, it disappeared from your inbox.
That's what we have at school! But I have never recalled a message. Now I want to do that all the time.
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2005 8:15:54 am PST #2202 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Now I want to do that all the time.
Pros of Groupwise:
- transparent recall
- delayed send (you can make it look like you were in the office until 7)
- detailed status (you can see not only if what you've sent has been read, but if it's been deleted)
Emily - Nov 08, 2005 8:16:39 am PST #2203 of 10006
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
I intend to vote, but I can't figure out who's running, or why I should vote for or against any of them! It's city council and school board, which means they're probably various flavors of liberal democrat environmentalists, but how can I know what flavors?
DXMachina - Nov 08, 2005 8:17:22 am PST #2204 of 10006
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
For some reason I'm convinced that's my favourite fairy tale, although it feels modern for a fairy tale. I have no substantiation for that.
Well, Andersen wrote it in the nineteenth century, so compared to a lot of fairy tales it isn't all that old.
Sophia Brooks - Nov 08, 2005 8:18:13 am PST #2205 of 10006
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
Part of my job involves sending out mass emails to, like 10,000 people all working here. The first one I did, I had my boss proof and she missed something, so she had me recall it. I corrected it and sent it again, and then HER boss asked us to recoll it and change something. Then I sent it again.
I feel like every one of those 10,000 people hates me personally now, since what we are sending is basically spam (we want them to take our classes).
§ ita § - Nov 08, 2005 8:18:43 am PST #2206 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Andersen wrote it in the nineteenth century, so compared to a lot of fairy tales it isn't all that old
But is it set more recently than the average fairy tale? Is there a cutoff for the setting of the genre?
sarameg - Nov 08, 2005 8:20:49 am PST #2207 of 10006
But all that stuff only works if your recipient has the same software, no? Well, except the delayed send.
I think someone tried to recall something they sent me once. I got this very cryptic followup email that was part garbled code, part automated message about deleting earlier email. I read the offending email anyway. It was lame.