I use it as a middle source. I still google first, scan the first page or so of hits to get a sense of the web out there, and then if it's something I can distill to a term I click on the definition highlight top right, read the dictionary, etc entries, and then usually use the wikipedia entry on that page as a starting point. From there, to be sure, I hit up Encyclopaedia Britannica or some similar pro source, if I need more than an understanding or perspective.
Buffy ,'Lessons'
Natter 39 and Holding
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I love various researching techniques!
I start with wikipedia as general overview and to see what links they have. Once i get a handle on what I'm looking for, I google with more specificity, and in the case of Dante, do the academic google.
I apparently am uninterested in actual knowledge. I only like factoids. Anyway, I use wikipedia once in a while, when I think of it.
For school I use paid databases.
t taking notes for class on Reference & Information Services
I have access to Books 24x7 through work, and rarely remember to use the damned thing. Text of actual books, and I'd rather google and surf. I don't think digitising books works for me -- I'm better off in something that was created ground up for the web.
I apparently am uninterested in actual knowledge [...] For school [...]
Hmm.
Hey, there was a Krav Maga reference on HIMYM!
I mean, personally. I google to find out stupid facts, not to actually learn about a topic.
For school, I search journals and whatnot. Still not as interested in actually learning as I might be.
Yankees lose. There is goodness and mercy in this world.
What did they say? Also .. there's a krav defense in Serenity, which made me laugh.
Yankees lose.
Oh thank god.