Zoe: Nobody's saying that, sir. Wash: Yeah, we're pretty much just giving each other significant glances and laughing incessantly.

'Our Mrs. Reynolds'


Natter 39 and Holding  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Laura - Oct 03, 2005 2:44:39 am PDT #2705 of 10002
Our wings are not tired.

President Bush has chosen White House counsel Harriet Miers as his nominee for the Supreme Court to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, CNN has learned. Miers, who has never been a judge, has been leading the White House effort to help Bush choose nominees to the Supreme Court.

I have no words.


Tom Scola - Oct 03, 2005 2:47:59 am PDT #2706 of 10002
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

So Bush once again chooses loyalty over competency? Good Lord, that man has a thick skull.


flea - Oct 03, 2005 2:49:33 am PDT #2707 of 10002
information libertarian

Dick Cheney II - Electric boogaloo. I mean, I really don't think it's that smart to pick the person in charge of the search committee for the job. So much for the CEO president.


Theodosia - Oct 03, 2005 2:56:24 am PDT #2708 of 10002
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

It's exactly Dick Cheney II.

In happier news, my car didn't get an overnight ticket, and I was able to move it to a non-permit space. Take that, The Man!


Laura - Oct 03, 2005 3:01:21 am PDT #2709 of 10002
Our wings are not tired.

May your shiny new car always duck The Man.

Really, I am without words on the nomination. It is just business as usual. Supreme Court appointments as gifts for political friends.

Need coffee.


Cashmere - Oct 03, 2005 3:04:18 am PDT #2710 of 10002
Now tagless for your comfort.

So Bush once again chooses loyalty over competency?

The fact that she's never been a judge means no judicial record. It will be twice as tough to find grounds on which to base an argument against her nomination. That fact that she's in his inner circle and was his private attorney assures him of her loyalty to his legislative agenda.

Can you buy burqas in pretty colors?


beth b - Oct 03, 2005 3:40:33 am PDT #2711 of 10002
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

one of matt's phones is beeping low battery at me. once again he sleeps thru it. I hope I have the right one plugged int. I seem to have a cold and I am still emotionally over wrought from Serenituy. Plus due the mini sf F2F - tired.


Calli - Oct 03, 2005 3:52:02 am PDT #2712 of 10002
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

I'm kind of confuzzled by the Bush nomination for the Supreme Court. Shouldn't one of the most important judges in the country have experience as a judge? Or is that just crazy talk?


Cashmere - Oct 03, 2005 3:55:42 am PDT #2713 of 10002
Now tagless for your comfort.

Shouldn't one of the most important judges in the country have experience as a judge? Or is that just crazy talk?

Historically, it's not that uncommon for a non-judge to be nominated.


Tom Scola - Oct 03, 2005 3:56:24 am PDT #2714 of 10002
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

It's not unprecedented to nominate non-judges to SCOTUS. But when non-judges get nominated, they tend to be high-profile politicians like Earl Warren, who was Governor of California, or William Taft, who was an ex-president.

I'd say that it's pretty unusual to nominate someone with this low a profile.