She ain't movin'. Serenity's not movin'.

Kaylee ,'Out Of Gas'


Spike's Bitches 26: Damn right I'm impure!  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Betsy HP - Oct 06, 2005 8:08:18 am PDT #6804 of 10001
If I only had a brain...

I routinely read LJs that aren't on my list.

Another paradigm shift. I only read people who are on my friendslist, or are linked to from people on my friendslist. If I follow a link to an interesting posting, I immediately friend it.

People go on/off my friendslist based on whether I find their blogs stimulating.


dw - Oct 06, 2005 8:09:05 am PDT #6805 of 10001
Silence means security silence means approval

On those "marzipan babies," here's the artist's website: [link]

I really like this one: [link] since it's such an Annabel look.


Topic!Cindy - Oct 06, 2005 8:09:53 am PDT #6806 of 10001
What is even happening?

Next on the gay agenda....

I hope the updates will be posted in the gay lobby, or I'll never keep up.


§ ita § - Oct 06, 2005 8:11:18 am PDT #6807 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

you invite people, people show up and say "Is it okay if I join in?, and it's rude to show up unannounced.

You're putting words into my mouth.

I am eternally curious about my audience. For the provocateuse sites and for buffistas.org, I go through referrer logs once a month. This gives me information that guides any changes I may think useful for either site. Both sites are undeniably broadcast media, and my behaviour is typical for the webmaster role. True?

As for LJ, so you're not the sort of person who posts a "how did you get here?" meme. So far, neither have I. But you still seem attached to my flip and casual use of the word "should", or lend a lot more weight to the word "cool" than I think it can support.

I read other people's LJs without assuming that creates any sort of bond between us.

Well, except in the software, since you equate reading and friending so absolutely.


Connie Neil - Oct 06, 2005 8:11:36 am PDT #6808 of 10001
brillig

I want marzapan.


§ ita § - Oct 06, 2005 8:12:01 am PDT #6809 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Another paradigm shift. I only read people who are on my friendslist, or are linked to from people on my friendslist. If I follow a link to an interesting posting, I immediately friend it.

How do you follow blogs?


Susan W. - Oct 06, 2005 8:12:12 am PDT #6810 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

Betsy is me WRT use of friendslist, friendslock, and more exclusive filters.

I do kinda wish I had the time and energy to go back and edit my public web presence to only the things I really want out there now that I'm planning to be a semi-public author-type person if/when I sell a book.

Of course, I'm planning to use a pen name, so in a way I do get to build a new public persona.


Aims - Oct 06, 2005 8:12:48 am PDT #6811 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

[link]

Marzipan for Connie!


lisah - Oct 06, 2005 8:13:39 am PDT #6812 of 10001
Punishingly Intricate

I'm kind of new to LJ and not so familiar with its conventions. I would always let somebody know if I wanted to friend them because it seems like the polite thing to do. But I also don't friend a ton of people. I'm wondering what the best way to asking somebody if you may friend them. What do people prefer? In a comment to a specific post? In a message to their email address if they have one listed?

I don't post much or much of anything but I would want to know why somebody friended me. Especially if it was somebody who wasn't actually a friend.


Betsy HP - Oct 06, 2005 8:13:57 am PDT #6813 of 10001
If I only had a brain...

you equate reading and friending so absolutely.

But the thing is, that is how I use LJ exclusively. I read LJ through my friendslist.

I'm not saying you should see it my way; I'm saying, look, here are two radically different descriptions and experiences of the same software. How I think it works, emotionally, is different from the way you think it works. Same tool, different mental model.

And I'm trying to back away from the "should"; I'm trying instead to talk about social expectations.

my behaviour is typical for the webmaster role. True?

Absolutely. And my POV is certainly marked by never having been a Webmaster, and by having no access to referrer logs. My view of the Web is that it's shouting down a well: I have no idea who is listening.