Miscellanea:
1. The Rolling Stones Rice Krispies commercial: [link]
2. Classical CDs illustrated by contemporary cartoonists: [link]
3. WFMU's fundraising marathon is going on, which means that Yo La Tengo will be performing this evening, and will play any song for a pledge of $10.
Classical CDs illustrated by contemporary cartoonists
The label website has all of them listed. There's a page for each CD with info about each cartoonist.
Question about the mixology: is it acceptable to include a
cover
of a cowbell song if you can't necessarily determine if said cowbell is actually present?
Question about the mixology: is it acceptable to include a cover of a cowbell song if you can't necessarily determine if said cowbell is actually present?
I'm going to take a hardline and argue that a cowbell song should prominently feature cowbell such that its presence is not in question. In short, More Cowbell!
I'm going to take a hardline and argue that a cowbell song should prominently feature cowbell such that its presence is not in question.
Well, if we're arguing...I'm going to argue that you should do what you want! Make a case for the song having the essence of cowbell or something.
OMG,
essence of cowbell
great band name, also just something I want to be able to buy in bottled form.
also just something I want to be able to buy in bottled form.
little bit metallic, little bit grassy, Totally Rock and Roll
This could get ugly:
"Where's the cowbell?"
"It's got cowbell."
"No, that's a glockenspiel."
"I say it's cowbell!"
"I have it on good authority that ****** ******* used a glockenspiel exclusively in the recording of ********. It says so right in ***** **** **** by *****."
"Here's your glock, Geekus Maximus!!!!"
whips out glock and open fire
Well, if we're arguing... I can see David's point, but I'm with lisah on this one for the slightly perverse reason that I'm delighted by the idea of meta-cowbell. "So the song has cowbell?" "Well, no, but we covered it because the original had cowbell. It really is all about the cowbell."
I can see David's point
Well, I'm an editor and it is my experience that writers
always
try to fudge the lines. So I like drawing them bright and clear.
However, I have no enforcement capacity so the worst that can happen is a cavil on my part. And the best is, "I was completely wrong! That song rocks with implicit cowbell and more than satisfies all requirements." I'm willing to be proven wrong.