This could get ugly:

"Where's the cowbell?"

"It's got cowbell."

"No, that's a glockenspiel."

"I say it's cowbell!"

"I have it on good authority that ****** ******* used a glockenspiel exclusively in the recording of ********. It says so right in ***** **** **** by *****."

"Here's your glock, Geekus Maximus!!!!" whips out glock and open fire

Well, if we're arguing... I can see David's point, but I'm with lisah on this one for the slightly perverse reason that I'm delighted by the idea of meta-cowbell. "So the song has cowbell?" "Well, no, but we covered it because the original had cowbell. It really is all about the cowbell."

I can see David's point

Well, I'm an editor and it is my experience that writers always try to fudge the lines. So I like drawing them bright and clear.

However, I have no enforcement capacity so the worst that can happen is a cavil on my part. And the best is, "I was completely wrong! That song rocks with implicit cowbell and more than satisfies all requirements." I'm willing to be proven wrong.

I dunno. I can't see the More Cowbell category without cowbell, myself, but part of the fun of the mix is the freedom to define the categories in ways that make sense to you.

Incidentally, I went back over my mix, and it is 95% done, but I didn't have time to upload it last night.

There ought to be at least a hint of cowbell.

But of course, there can never be enough cowbell.

Punky Chips Ahoy - Oi! Oi! Oi! [link]

whee I finished my liner notes! Should I post them here? Send them to the buffitarawk2? Or both?

From Corwood's post:

H. Liner notes make it more fun for everyone, so send them with your mix and, if you wish, post them here.

I'm just nervous because I'm the First One! (Also, proud. And thinking I deserve a cookie!)