'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
[NAFDA] Spoiler Policy: Seasons 1-3 and the movie are fair game. Spoiler font two weeks for new content presented all at once (e.g. Season 4 on Hulu is fair game as of Aug. 9, 2019). New content presented as weekly episodes may be discussed with no restrictions as it is released.
Zero. Rob's explained that although they didn't plan on revealing it onscreen, they believed Sally to be a pet of Dick's that Beaver had disappeared (i.e., killed), basically just a sign that there was a darker side to the kid
Huh. I think my eyeroll sprained something. That's... lame.
Hey! We were eye-rolling simultaneously!
A criminology department, though? @@
I went to a medium sized, state school and we had a criminal justice program (it was sort of criminology/criminal justice). They were mostly just associates' degrees for people who wanted to pursue law enforcement careers. My sister may have enven taken some criminology courses in her pre-law program, but I'd have to double check with her. ITT has a school of criminal justice, too.
But while I could see him raping Parker, I still don't see him shaving her head.
I would think if he did rape her, he shaved her head to throw suspicion. It's devious, true, but the answer to the mysteries on this show rarely have to do with believable character traits.
I just like the idea that we are being tricked into thinking that Dick is too obvious as a suspect, and that the answer is that he's responsible for Parker and the Hearst rapist is a different person-- the tea-sipping RA, the TA, or the criminology professor.
who was the TA? Why was he wearing a wig?
Maybe he has hair issues, and that's why he shaves his victims' heads.
I just like the idea that we are being tricked into thinking that Dick is too obvious as a suspect, and that the answer is that he's responsible for Parker
If that ends up the case, though, I will roll my eyes even harder. Dick has been drunk and barely coherent for days (and I don't think he -- the character -- is a good enough actor to pull that off as an act), so that shaving Parker's head to throw suspicion *off* himself -- when he's been *seen* at the dorm, drunk and disorderly -- is too convoluted and stupid to be believed.
Did we ever find out what the outcome of the hooker strealing the defense attorney's (who I love but can't remember the name of right now) briefcase? Was that in service of getting Aaron Echols out of jail?
Yes. I typed this over on TWoP last week, in fact:
Aaron's cellmate got Daphne to steal Cliff's briefcase in order to get the key to the Echolls storage locker, which housed the Oscar that Kendall decorated with Lilly's blood and Duncan's hair in order to frame Duncan for Lilly's murder.
Whew.
Zero. Rob's explained that although they didn't plan on revealing it onscreen, they believed Sally to be a pet of Dick's that Beaver had disappeared (i.e., killed), basically just a sign that there was a darker side to the kid
Huh. I think my eyeroll sprained something. That's... lame.
Super lame.
(I also dislike the trend for the creator/writer to have to tell the audience something through a venue that isn't the actual broadcast show. If you can't tell it/convey it in an episode, if it requires that you explain it in an article or on the internet, etc., then it doesn't belong in the show. A season -- or an arc, or even an episode -- ought to be a self-contained thing. If the creator has to break the fourth wall to tell us that Sally was a pet, then it shouldn't have been in the episode to begin with.)
(I should note that I'm not harshing only on RT; Joss did the let-me-explain-this-to-you thing in S7, I'm pretty sure, and don't EVEN get me started on DC Comics' bullshit of having to explain things that happen in the comics. The word is "self-contained," people. Learn it. Know it. Live it.)
Aha, OK then. Thanks!
If the creator has to break the fourth wall to tell us that Sally was a pet, then it shouldn't have been in the episode to begin with.
Amen.