Buffy: Synchronized slaying. Faith: New Olympic category?

'Conversations with Dead People'


Veronica Mars: Annoy, Tiny Blonde One. Annoy Like the Wind.

[NAFDA] Spoiler Policy: Seasons 1-3 and the movie are fair game. Spoiler font two weeks for new content presented all at once (e.g. Season 4 on Hulu is fair game as of Aug. 9, 2019). New content presented as weekly episodes may be discussed with no restrictions as it is released.


Polter-Cow - Jan 26, 2006 3:18:24 am PST #1694 of 5730
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

[link]


DebetEsse - Jan 26, 2006 3:19:20 am PST #1695 of 5730
Woe to the fucking wicked.

i'm with Hil, for the additional reason that depending on him being willing to come onboard at that late date seems suspect to me, like poor planning. The whole thing plays better as a heist movie, IMO, so it would all have to be planned, like, a lot.

I gave up on baby-size a long time ago. As long as they're pre-lingual, I'm not going to fuss too much.


Hil R. - Jan 26, 2006 3:47:20 am PST #1696 of 5730
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Guess there is a minimum age for the wee ones to get their SAG card.

I looked this up once, a few years ago. California law is no babies in TV or movies until they're 15 days old. Some shows have tried to make birth scenes look more believable by casting preemies who are technically 15 days old but it's really still before their actual due date, but enough people were complaining about that (really not safe for babies that little to be around that many people) that most shows have stopped.


Wolfram - Jan 26, 2006 5:03:20 am PST #1697 of 5730
Visilurking

i'm with Hil, for the additional reason that depending on him being willing to come onboard at that late date seems suspect to me, like poor planning. The whole thing plays better as a heist movie, IMO, so it would all have to be planned, like, a lot.

I think it had to be after the note. Sleazy PI doesn't have the chops to pull off that kind of charade. The only thing they could rely on him to be is, sleazy. So the note tells him there's 30 grand in it for him if he sells out his client, he jumps at the chance. Also if he was in it at the beginning, then all that posturing with VM was scripted which makes it pointless since nobody else was there.

The numbers on the fortune were exactly the ones from Lost? Damn.


Narrator - Jan 26, 2006 5:31:11 am PST #1698 of 5730
The evil is this way?

There was a "Cupid" shout-out -- Wallace was at Trevor Hale High School in Chicago. Trevor Hale was the lead character's name in "Cupid" which was also set in Chicago.


Kalshane - Jan 26, 2006 6:01:06 am PST #1699 of 5730
GS: If you had to choose between kicking evil in the head or the behind, which would you choose, and why? Minsc: I'm not sure I understand the question. I have two feet, do I not? You do not take a small plate when the feast of evil welcomes seconds.

I also wish it had been clearer when Vinnie had been brought on board, and how they even got Astrid involved in the first place.

I did love the "Mornin', Sam." "Mornin', Ralph" exchange, though.


Hayden - Jan 26, 2006 6:05:47 am PST #1700 of 5730
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

That was my favorite part, too. The overall episode seemed contrived and a bit muddled to me, though.


Stephanie - Jan 26, 2006 6:15:46 am PST #1701 of 5730
Trust my rage

I'm glad that others reacted the way I did. I sort of just posted this as a comment over in(meara's & P-C's) LJ, but the baby really took me out of the story. Maybe it's a mom thing (since I see Plei and Cash made similar comments) but I kept thinking "how could you hand your baby over to those strangers?" and other more predictable questions about baby care in general.

However, way beyond all the baby issues were the custody issues. I guess it is possible to imagine some scenario where Duncan would not have rights to the baby, but it would be complicated enough that it should have been addressed. Otherwise, it's a simple issue. He's the dad - he has custody. I can see why he might not want Meg's parents to have their hands on the baby, even for a few weeks, but still. Honestly, I don't think the hospital would just turn the baby over to Meg's parents. I think they would want some determination from the court (to avoid being sued if nothing else).


Hayden - Jan 26, 2006 6:29:41 am PST #1702 of 5730
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

I agree completely. The whole issue of whether Duncan could legally take the baby was absurd (especially considering that they've established that he's 18 and thus legally an adult), as was bringing in Celeste, who has no say in the matter one way or another. Also, they should have shown us Meg's parents at some point. Finally, the whole issue of Wallace's return was taken waaaay too casually. I'm fairly disappointed in Mr. Thomas's script.


Narrator - Jan 26, 2006 7:04:38 am PST #1703 of 5730
The evil is this way?

An 18 year old high school student could lose his/her child to the grandparents. It does happen. The standard in most states is "best interest of the child."

Meg's parents make a good appearance. They're church goers and have raised other children. They can certainly argue that it's in the baby's best interest to stay with them. They'll fight Duncan every step of the way and argue that the child has "bonded" with them in the interim. We know they're abusive, but Meg's e-mails did not refer to them as the abusers and I expect that the closet in Grace's room no longer has a secret room.

Also, Meg's parents could make hay with Duncan's outbursts, need for medication, his immaturity and his lack of financial support. Duncan is in a particularly bad spot if his parents were unwilling to help him with money (the thing with VM selling Celeste's jewelry indicates that the Kanes were not going to be supportive of Duncan keeping the baby).