I just got an email from House of Blues that Echo and the Bunnymen will be playing in December. I might have to go to that.
Buffy? I like that. That girl's so hot, she's buffy.
Forrest ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Natter .38 Special
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
NoiseDesign - Aug 23, 2005 11:37:17 am PDT #549 of 10002
Our wings are not tired
Nutty - Aug 23, 2005 11:40:29 am PDT #550 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
Also, Nutty, once I'm teaching can you come in to do that lecture? Nobody ever seems to get that. "If this is true half the time and this is true half the time, what's the probability of their both being true at the same time?" "Er... one!"
Yes! I will be there with mathematically-improbable bells on.
Vortex - Aug 23, 2005 11:40:40 am PDT #551 of 10002
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
people are strange . . .
NoiseDesign - Aug 23, 2005 11:41:40 am PDT #552 of 10002
Our wings are not tired
I love the quotes from the Time Cube site:
If you place a child in a room and in the hands of a Word God, the child will suffer severe loneliness and will starve to death. God is Word fiction.
One day when I'm really bored I'm going to read the whole thing. I'll probably end up insane.
§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 11:42:32 am PDT #553 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
How could someone read that article and let it get put up as news?
How could someone read that article, not notice that they're talking about the probably [sic] of God's existence and then put it up as news?
tommyrot - Aug 23, 2005 11:45:59 am PDT #554 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
If you place a child in a room and in the hands of a Word God, the child will suffer severe loneliness and will starve to death. God is Word fiction.
So we should use WordPerfect?
bon bon - Aug 23, 2005 11:48:11 am PDT #555 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
I recalled that Bob has mentioned Swinburne in the past so I called him, and he's writing me an email explaining this which I will post. But for the interim, I will note that he said Swinburne is arguably the greatest natural theologian since Aquinas. IOW, not an idiot.
Apparently, a natural theologican tries to prove the existence of God through evidence available to everyone.
§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 11:52:03 am PDT #556 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
the greatest natural theologian since
Are there different sorts of theologians? I mean, is natural like a natural-born theologian, or a theological term?
bon bon - Aug 23, 2005 11:53:42 am PDT #557 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Are there different sorts of theologians? I mean, is natural like a natural-born theologian, or a theological term?
Apparently, a natural theologican tries to prove the existence of God through evidence available to everyone.
Jesse - Aug 23, 2005 11:54:46 am PDT #558 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Are there different sorts of theologians? I mean, is natural like a natural-born theologian, or a theological term?
I think the answer to that is this:
Apparently, a natural theologican tries to prove the existence of God through evidence available to everyone.
I still say theologian is not the same as logician.