How could someone read that article and let it get put up as news?
How could someone read that article, not notice that they're talking about the probably [sic] of God's existence and then put it up as news?
I fell down and got confused. Willow fixed me. She's gay.
BuffyBot ,'Dirty Girls'
Natter .38 Special
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 11:42:32 am PDT #553 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
tommyrot - Aug 23, 2005 11:45:59 am PDT #554 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
If you place a child in a room and in the hands of a Word God, the child will suffer severe loneliness and will starve to death. God is Word fiction.
So we should use WordPerfect?
bon bon - Aug 23, 2005 11:48:11 am PDT #555 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
I recalled that Bob has mentioned Swinburne in the past so I called him, and he's writing me an email explaining this which I will post. But for the interim, I will note that he said Swinburne is arguably the greatest natural theologian since Aquinas. IOW, not an idiot.
Apparently, a natural theologican tries to prove the existence of God through evidence available to everyone.
§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 11:52:03 am PDT #556 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
the greatest natural theologian since
Are there different sorts of theologians? I mean, is natural like a natural-born theologian, or a theological term?
bon bon - Aug 23, 2005 11:53:42 am PDT #557 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Are there different sorts of theologians? I mean, is natural like a natural-born theologian, or a theological term?
Apparently, a natural theologican tries to prove the existence of God through evidence available to everyone.
Jesse - Aug 23, 2005 11:54:46 am PDT #558 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Are there different sorts of theologians? I mean, is natural like a natural-born theologian, or a theological term?
I think the answer to that is this:
Apparently, a natural theologican tries to prove the existence of God through evidence available to everyone.
I still say theologian is not the same as logician.
§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 11:55:01 am PDT #559 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
What are the other sorts of theologians, and do they try to prove the existence of God? If so, how?
Nutty - Aug 23, 2005 11:55:13 am PDT #560 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
through evidence available to everyone.
Everyone who has never taken a statistics class, I fear.
DavidS - Aug 23, 2005 11:57:29 am PDT #561 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
What are the other sorts of theologians, and do they try to prove the existence of God?
Rhetoric and stuff.
If so, how?
Or hand puppets. Manger Babies.
tommyrot - Aug 23, 2005 11:58:55 am PDT #562 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
God exists, because it says so in the Bible, and the Bible is the word of God.