Yeah, I might scream at Condi, but it wouldn't be because she was buying shoes or even expensive shoes. It'd be because I think she has and continues to hurt the country. ALso, she's super snotty in her congressional hearings and I kinda just hate her.

I actually wouldn't scream at anyone, probably ever. But I might write in to Gawker. And if I DID, I would make sure to describe Condi's outfit, so as to let people know if she was in work attire or not.

Neither Angry Lady nor most of us have stopped our lives for this, and I fucking hope crazy screaming people are immediately removed from people who have secret service protection.

she probably knows this. It was just an excuse to scream at Condi. :)

In more amusing news, Overheard In The Office has taken to posting one thing an hour, through the work day. [link]

I would not have screamed at condi. But I work in public service. Part of the job - is dealing with people that scream at me. Maybe because I don't have anyone to stand between me and the public, but I don't think the secret service needed to be invovled .

I would scream at Condi about how comparing the Lusitania to Sept. 11 was stupidest metaphor in the whole entire world, and then I would proceed to assault her with a history textbook. And then I would be arrested in as spectacular and Jon-Stewart-attracting a fashion as possible.

I have never gotten over how she went before the 9/11 commission and was allowed to waste 30 minutes of her (pre-determined) allotted time talking about the stupid, stupid Lusitania.

My library has a disaster plan.

Mine did to, when I worked there. I think it's a formal requirement of any arm of city/town government, although the rule seems to be oft-honored in its breach. At any rate, there was a scenario-wheel, and a giant bin of Important Tools (flashlights, tarps, etc.).

I was thinking something alone similar lines, bon.

Me too.

I don't think the secret service needed to be invovled .

It's their job, though, to remove people before it's apparent they're a threat. If you can't keep it together enough to not shriek irrelevantly at a high-ranking government official, I consider it perfectly fair.

Hell, if I were doing security for Britney freaking Spears, I'd see what I could do to have the person removed.

If I were managing the store, same thing, no matter who was being shrieked at, if they hadn't started it.

My library has a disaster plan.

My company has one. I know this because I wrote it.

I can't cope with it. I have to stop reading news about the hurricane.

Indeed.

But, first, I'm going to rage a bit.

I don't fault Dubya for not "preventing" the flooding in NOLA. It was going to happen no matter what. That's the way this city was designed and built. It's odd that an "improved" levee collapsed, but I'm not sure what to make of this.

I hold Dubya personally responsible for caring less about hurricanes and caring more about terror attacks.

Mostly I agree, but I do hold him a bit responsible. We've refused to sign the Kyoto Accords, or any international agreement that has an eye toward limiting the negative effects of industry on the environment. Yes, there have been Cat 5 storms before global warming, and no, I can't prove Katrina was the direct result of global warming, but the administration's head-in-the-backside-of-industry stance isn't helping. And even though this will cost the US billions of dollars, I doubt Bush or his affiliates will change their spots.

Also, I'm not entirely sure I agree that he cares about terror attacks. Other than instituting DHS and making some other domestic changes like the Patriot Act that look suspiciously like steps toward fascism, he hasn't done much against terrorists.

However, I am sure that his supporters will continue to say he's a wonderful president.

BARNES: But last year, when there were two hurricanes, and I got a new roof, I paid my part. My private insurance company paid the other part. The federal government and taxpayers paid no part.

Except, even private insurance spreads the cost out to other people.

Barnes' stance is the stance that just drives me fucking apeshit, the "I can do what I want to, but you all have to suck it up." He can distribute the costs of having his (second? third?) home in a nice but unsafe place, while everyone else should've had the foresight to live somewhere cheap and safe. I'm sure all the folks living well below the poverty line in Metarie appreciate his wisdom.

I think the White House has gotten it's act together. But the first two days were not impressive.

I don't. And I don't like the fact that once again, they are reactive (and slow at that). It's not like we didn't see this coming.

As much as I hate to say it, I don't think we should rebuild New Orleans. There's going to have to be a port there, but the talk of rebuilding the whole city strikes me as shock talking. Shock, and the latter-day conservatism (not the political kind) that says maps can't change, and cities need to always be where they've been. If we do rebuild it, I hope they use the Galveston model Nutty mentioned, and do it right. But I won't hold my breath; politics in Louisiana have always been more, um, pork-barrelly, than that.