My pleasure.
And the sub-destroying bug should be gone now.
I'm not on the ship. I'm in the ship. I am the ship.
River ,'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Dec 06, 2005 1:35:54 pm PST #784 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Ailleann - Dec 06, 2005 3:02:00 pm PST #785 of 4673
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
Um... sadly, no. Still no message center.
§ ita § - Dec 06, 2005 3:31:10 pm PST #786 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Sorry -- your subs are gone forever. It's just that they won't ever be killed again.
Sorry again.
Ailleann - Dec 06, 2005 4:45:01 pm PST #787 of 4673
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
Never mind, I figgered it out. Thanks ita.
Jesse - Dec 07, 2005 11:16:33 am PST #788 of 4673
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I heart the message I got when I tried to post in the closed thread. Cute and nice.
Just like us.
DXMachina - Dec 07, 2005 11:24:09 am PST #789 of 4673
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I thought we fixed the thing where people could still post in a thread that hit 10,000.
§ ita § - Dec 07, 2005 11:25:54 am PST #790 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Yeah, me too. I'm going to have to look into that.
Tom Scola - Dec 07, 2005 11:27:48 am PST #791 of 4673
Mr. Scola’s wardrobe by Botany 500
Again, it's a race condition. New posts can arrive concurrently during the time that you're verifiying that your own post # is less than 10000. You can't completely prevent it short of locking the database while you check. Which would slow the board down considerably.
DXMachina - Dec 07, 2005 11:33:13 am PST #792 of 4673
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
But they didn't really arrive concurrently. 10,005 was posted 13 seconds after 10,000.
§ ita § - Dec 07, 2005 11:34:23 am PST #793 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
New posts can arrive concurrently during the time that you're verifiying that your own post # is less than 10000.
That's not the race, though. As part of the 10000th post going through, the thread header is flagged with "closed." The checking happens when the next post is trying to be written, and if that flag has flipped, no go.
And it used to be much tighter, I swear. The time stamps on those post-10000 posts are pretty far apart.
If that's all taking 13 seconds, something's up somewhere...