Could your firewall be as simplistic as blocking a link that has "ad" in the link text?
1. a link
2. an ad
Gunn: We open a can of Machiavelli on his ass. Harmony: It's Matchabelli, Einstein, and it doesn't come in a can.
'Soul Purpose'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
amych - Oct 11, 2005 12:20:46 pm PDT #640 of 4671
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Dana - Oct 11, 2005 12:21:21 pm PDT #641 of 4671
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."
What about a direct link to an image?
DXMachina - Oct 11, 2005 12:41:10 pm PDT #642 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Could your firewall be as simplistic as blocking a link that has "ad" in the link text?
Yeah, an ad blocker might just do that.
Topic!Cindy - Oct 11, 2005 12:43:08 pm PDT #643 of 4671
What is even happening?
Could your firewall be as simplistic as blocking a link that has "ad" in the link text?
1. a link
2. an ad
Nope.
What about a direct link to an image?I'm assuming that was all you put in your post, Dana? If you also included a link, I'm not seeing it.
I have gone directly to images plenty of times before, though.
Topic!Cindy - Oct 11, 2005 12:45:01 pm PDT #644 of 4671
What is even happening?
![[link]](http://images.apple.com/home/2005/images/ipodnanohand20050907.jpg){kind=link}
Above this I have posted the full url for images.apple.com/home/2005/images/ipodnanohand20050907.jpg
eta...
I can see it.
§ ita § - Oct 11, 2005 1:03:47 pm PDT #645 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Unrelated to Cindy's errant firewall -- there's some design that needs be done.
The request has been made for breadcrumbs to assist with folder navigation. I also think that presenting a folder list at the top of the thread screen (folders at the same level as the thread) will cut down on back and forth.
What thinkest you? And, Jon, how would you present this?
JenP - Oct 11, 2005 6:42:20 pm PDT #646 of 4671
I think this is kind of over now, but for what it's worth, I had the same problem Cindy had with ita's post and could then see all the links you posted in here to test theories. I use IE6.
Topic!Cindy - Oct 12, 2005 2:06:09 am PDT #647 of 4671
What is even happening?
See? I'm not the only inmate in the asylum.
Jon B. - Oct 13, 2005 8:17:00 am PDT #648 of 4671
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Could your firewall be as simplistic as blocking a link that has "ad" in the link text?
Could be when "ad" is in the url of the link.
The request has been made for breadcrumbs to assist with folder navigation. I also think that presenting a folder list at the top of the thread screen (folders at the same level as the thread) will cut down on back and forth.
I don't quite understand the request.
(sorry for the delay. I was out of town for a bit)
§ ita § - Oct 13, 2005 8:28:51 am PDT #649 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
1. Breadcrumbs -- so when you're in a given folder, you have a link somewhere (top and bottom), I'm guessing to the parent folder, not just the root, as we have now.
2. Access to folders at the same level as the thread you're reading, from inside the thread -- so you don't have to come back to the list of threads to select a given folder.
I think #1 is important, and #2 might not be workable or worth it. Just wondering on the formatting for both.
Also -- for the triangles indicating the folders right now on the front page -- I don't think a) that triangles are accurate in this context, and 2. that listing them vertically scales well.