Done.
As Willow goes, so goes my nation.
Oz ,'Selfless'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Apr 04, 2012 11:50:40 am PDT #3179 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
§ ita § - Jun 27, 2012 1:27:05 pm PDT #3180 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
So, I understand our styling is incorrect. Currently, t cite is used for quotations, but that's not what the tag was designed for (it's supposed to be for the name of the work). It should be t blockquote .
Worthy fixing? Obviously it's not a biggie, but it might bork up people's custom style sheets.
Liese S. - Jun 27, 2012 1:40:58 pm PDT #3181 of 4673
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Yeah, it should be <blockquote>. I don't know how extensively the majority of the userbase has customized their style sheets. It should be reasonably simple for them to correct, if it causes them problems, right?
§ ita § - Jun 27, 2012 1:50:03 pm PDT #3182 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I couldn't think why it would be anything but.
amych - Jun 27, 2012 2:31:46 pm PDT #3183 of 4673
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Yeah, even for those who have done a lot, it would just be a matter of search/replace for that selector.
edit: better still, for anyone who has restyled the t cite tag in custom css, instead of replacing it with
blockquotereplace it with
cite, blockquoteThat will catch both, in case of naughty people who don't use the quick-edits. Like I didn't on my first attempt there, and you see what trouble it brought me!
Jon B. - Jun 28, 2012 1:44:20 am PDT #3184 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Would it be bad form to search the table containing personal CSSes to see if it's even an issue?
-t - Jun 28, 2012 4:30:40 am PDT #3185 of 4673
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Will making this change make the ">" and "]" quick edits interchangeable?
t really too ignorant to be in this conversation, but curious
amych - Jun 28, 2012 5:05:51 am PDT #3186 of 4673
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Would it be bad form to search the table containing personal CSSes to see if it's even an issue?
I can't see any issue with a search to see how many people are touching it; just a few people would have a different impact than lots. (I'd also be really curious to know something about how many people are customizing at all, and how much - in a totally anonymous way, of course)
§ ita § - Jun 28, 2012 5:07:57 am PDT #3187 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
We don't have any tags that generate t blockquote . ']' generates t dfn .
-t - Jun 28, 2012 5:57:36 am PDT #3188 of 4673
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Thanks!