The context in which I use threadsuck make whitefont/no whitefont irrelevant. In other words, as far as I'm concerned to it either way.
Mal: Okay. She won't be winning any beauty contests anytime soon. But she is solid. Ship like this, be with ya 'til the day you die. Zoe: 'Cause it's a deathtrap.
'Out Of Gas'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Typo Boy - Apr 13, 2009 3:45:57 pm PDT #2832 of 4673
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
meara - Apr 13, 2009 4:08:07 pm PDT #2833 of 4673
Yeah, my feeling is kinda, if it's a huge pain to do, it's low on my list of "things to prioritize doing". It's a "that'd be nice, I've noticed it once or twice, but it hasn't killed me, just made me momentarily befuddled or spoiled and mostly for something I don't watch or since I was catching up, had already seen"
§ ita § - Apr 15, 2009 2:03:27 pm PDT #2834 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Fixed.
Vortex - Apr 15, 2009 2:07:11 pm PDT #2835 of 4673
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
I'm curious about something-- why are Film and TV discussions "filed" differently when it comes to closed threads?
Every other thread is Closed Threads/Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer, but closed tv threads are filed Film and TV Discussions/Closed Film and TV Threads/Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.
I notice it because I will unsub to a thread sometimes when I haven't had a chance to watch a show, and it makes it harder to find the thread when I want to resubscribe.
Jesse - Apr 15, 2009 2:22:28 pm PDT #2836 of 4673
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Fixed.
Yay! Thanks.
§ ita § - Apr 15, 2009 2:32:22 pm PDT #2837 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
why are Film and TV discussions "filed" differently when it comes to closed threads?
Film and TV Discussion closed threads are a subfolder of the Film and TV Folder. Main folder closed threads are put into a subfolder of the main folder.
I'm not sure how it makes the thread harder to find--shouldn't it make it easier?
Vortex - Apr 15, 2009 3:31:30 pm PDT #2838 of 4673
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Film and TV Discussion closed threads are a subfolder of the Film and TV Folder. Main folder closed threads are put into a subfolder of the main folder.
I get that, I was just wondering why the Film and TV folders were set up differently
I'm not sure how it makes the thread harder to find--shouldn't it make it easier?
no, because I can skim immediately past any line that starts with "closed", whereas, I have to read into the line for Film and TV. Not a huge deal, just vaguely annoying.
Nilly - Apr 15, 2009 10:07:41 pm PDT #2839 of 4673
Swouncing
Is it possible that there is something wonky with the Threadsuck option around post 15,000?
I was trying to threadsuck Natter (in order to pretend to at least skim, and not downright skip). I was behind (um, *way* behind) post 15,000, and it threadsucked only until post # 15,000.
I manually (clicking "Next") went past post 15,000, and when I tried to threadsuck then, it sucked from post 15,000 *until* the post that the threadsuck was supposed to begin with.
I repeated it several times, each at a different post # (larger than 15,000), and it happened each time. The first post sucked was 15,000, and the last post sucked was the one which was supposed to be the first.
I have no idea if this is my browser, Natter sticking out its tongue to me for skipping so much, or matzah crumbs creating bugs, though. So I turn to you for help.
Jon B. - Apr 16, 2009 1:31:55 am PDT #2840 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
15000 was hard coded into the program as a default ending post number if the user left that field blank. I just changed it to 99999 so it should work now. Thanks for discovering that!
Dana - Apr 20, 2009 6:36:25 pm PDT #2841 of 4673
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
I feel like I'm seeing the random quotes be not so random. It's possible that I just spend too much time on the site and am imagining it, but didn't we have a randomizing problem before?