That block of links is offset on mine too, and I haven't touched the CSS. (My lone edit was to make spoilers grey instead of invisible.)
Inara: So. Would you like to lecture me on the wickedness of my ways? Book: I brought you some supper, but if you'd prefer a lecture, I've a few very catchy ones prepped. Sin and hellfire... one has lepers.
'Serenity'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Jessica - Apr 07, 2009 6:57:55 am PDT #2754 of 4673
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Jesse - Apr 07, 2009 7:09:45 am PDT #2755 of 4673
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Oh, I am looking at the standard as-provided site.
Dana - Apr 07, 2009 8:19:45 am PDT #2756 of 4673
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
It's offset for me in IE, but not in Firefox.
Jon B. - Apr 07, 2009 8:42:25 am PDT #2757 of 4673
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
There's a small offset in Firefox, which is expected. In IE6, the red plus signs don't appear and the items that would have a plus sign are offset to where the plus signs would be.
Dana - Apr 07, 2009 8:43:23 am PDT #2758 of 4673
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
In IE6, the red plus signs don't appear and the items that would have a plus sign are offset to where the plus signs would be.
Wait, that's what I meant. What Jon said. In IE7.
§ ita § - Apr 07, 2009 4:55:27 pm PDT #2759 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Semantically speaking, the entries in the menus to the rightleft should be lists, I think. It makes the HTML cleaner, and the styling (now) easier to reformat. That's what I was trying to achieve yesterday, but I can't work out how to do it in a degradable fashion.
It's bugging me.
Liese S. - Apr 07, 2009 7:41:16 pm PDT #2760 of 4673
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Yeah, I really like the idea of where you're going. But I am of no help whatsoever about css.
§ ita § - Apr 07, 2009 8:52:50 pm PDT #2761 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Along that same theory the Read New nav bar, the Buffistas Home footer and the Threadsuck row of links should also be links. Which are a snap to duplicate, formatting wise, in the more recent gens of browsers, but not all across the user base.
Speaking of which, the crumbs should be at the top of the list of posts and the bottom, but still working out just where.
Liese S. - Apr 07, 2009 8:54:59 pm PDT #2762 of 4673
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Oh, good. And yeah, I know. There's not necessarily an analogous position at the bottom.
§ ita § - Apr 08, 2009 7:00:37 am PDT #2763 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
How does this look to people? I'm not sure of the range of browser validity.