Book ,'Objects In Space'
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Why the label "subfolders" though. Aren't they just folders?
Folders can be nested indefinitely. The code that displays the main page is the same as the code that displays a folder deep. So that's why. I could do a check to see if you're at level 0, but it's not happening today.
Folders can be nested indefinitely. The code that displays the main page is the same as the code that displays a folder deep. So that's why. I could do a check to see if you're at level 0, but it's not happening today.
Huh. I have the feeling that is supposed to make sense to me, but I hit the word code and suddenly, not so much.
Really? I figure most people will spin out at "nested." The rest isn't even in English.
It's a librarian thing, I guess.
Or an accountant thing. I don't much like it, either.
It's just... Neat.
I actually think it makes the board look more cluttered, or at least more busy.
Ah. This is where you're discussing it.
One question, since I don't use enough of the board to really be entitled to an opinion: Subfolders?
The writer in me is growling softly and saying, no, the stuff inside those two headers are the subfolders. The headers themselves can't be sub; they've got the whiphand over all the little threads that go inside them, and are clearly Dom, not Sub....
I don't understand -- is that the same question that Perkins was asking? They are sub to the main level.
We're all sub to something, in the end.
Is the word "subfolders" that shows up in the crimson bar hard coded in, or could you replace it with any text, ita?