Yes! Ohmigod! Someone's blondie bear's a twenty-question genius!

Harmony ,'Help'


Buffistas Building a Better Board ++

Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.


esse - Feb 06, 2007 12:40:48 pm PST #1105 of 4673
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

::wipes brow:: Whew, glad other people wanted it. It's come in really handy for deleting hundreds of memories on livejournal, and it seems like it would be handy here.


amych - Feb 08, 2007 11:02:04 am PST #1106 of 4673
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Heads up: duplicate post numbering in Natter, combined with really slow board performance when the rest of the internet is behaving normally.


§ ita § - Feb 08, 2007 11:06:51 am PST #1107 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It happens when everyone's jumping on posting in the same thread at really close times--like a thread ending or starting, or Hec's games.

Fuck, there are so many things half done. Tag closing in posts needs fixing, I have rewritten the code to use CSS positioning only, but the posting box is wack in IE, and then there was the project to switch the back end out to Postgres.

And that's not even counting the bugs reported above.


amych - Feb 08, 2007 11:10:04 am PST #1108 of 4673
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Thanks, ita. I'd hoped that's all it was, but I wanted to be sure it wasn't anything weird or dangerous.


Aims - Feb 15, 2007 11:12:18 am PST #1109 of 4673
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Got this posting just now: There has been an error. It's of the type we call fatal. Please don't be scared. You're not the one that's going to die.

Okay, where the $$&#&(@#& are the developers? February 15, 2007, 1:11 pm Aimée[68]: FATAL [256] SELECT COUNT(*) AS sub_count FROM subscriptions WHERE user_id=68 AND thread_id= failed: You have an error in your SQL syntax near '' at line 1 Fatal error in line 103 of file /home/httpd/vhosts/buffistas.org/httpdocs/classes/giles.php, PHP 4.3.10 (Linux)

Fatal error in context array ( 0 => array ( 'query' => 'SELECT COUNT(*) AS sub_count FROM subscriptions WHERE user_id=68 AND thread_id=', 'db' => NULL, 'result' => false, ), )Aborting...

I use Firefox.

(Erm...am I supposed to be alerting you guys to this or not? I'm not sure.)


Sue - Feb 21, 2007 5:47:08 am PST #1110 of 4673
hip deep in pie

I just wanted to mention here that the board has been responding very slowly for me when I post or edit. Reading it has been fine, just posting. It's been happening at work and at home, so it's not just the computer or connection.

I'm using Firefox for Windows XP at home and work. At home I'm on dial-up and at work it's a T1 line.


Rob - Feb 28, 2007 10:11:07 am PST #1111 of 4673

I'd be happy to help figure out how to make the board more efficient.


§ ita § - Mar 02, 2007 5:40:08 pm PST #1112 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Well, ain't that grand.

Below I reproduce an email from iStrata support. Read upwards for the history. Sorry about the line breaks:

Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:08:01 -0800
From: support( at )istrata.com
Subject: [ #BCM-87880-427]: Fwd: Plesk key update deferral notification
To: ita( at )thevelvetedge.com

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, ita( at )thevelvetedge.com wrote:

> Wait--so if we don't pay you to upgrade, is this something we can do
> ourselves? And if we don't upgrade, we're going to have
> compatibility problems?

It's a bit complicated. You don't have to upgrade (we can request that your license be locked to the version you're using (7.5.4). But, like I said in the message below support for Red Hat 7.3 has been discontinued by SWSoft (makers of Plesk). So, unless you do upgrade you're stuck with what you have which is Red Hat 7.5 (which hasn't had any OS updates for several years) and Plesk 7.5.4.

There's no way to do the OS level upgrade yourself. You can save yourself some money by moving your data from one server to the other yourself. But, we're still going to have to bring up a new server for you, and moving from one server to another can get complicated. By having us do the upgrade you eliminate most of the problems (and associated down time) you might encounter if you were to try to do it for yourself.

Kevin

>
> At 06:53 PM 3/2/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>> For your benefit we keep all our licenses under "software update
>> support" contract. Because of that our licenses are always set to
>> the most current version (so you can update as required). We can
>> request that the license key used on your server be backed down to
>> 7.5 but it does complicate things in the long run because it creates
>> a special condition that has to be tracked. However, if you do
>> decide to upgrade Plesk you'll have to update to Cent OS 3.8 because
>> Plesk doesn't support installing newer versions on top of your
>> version (7.3) of Red Hat. So, unless you upgrade your OS your
>> current configuration is where you'll be stuck (Red Hat 7.3 and
>> Plesk 7.5.4). This is probably as good a time as any to upgrade
>> rather than waiting for the versions to get even further apart.
>>
>> The OS upgrade requires that we move you from your current server to
>> a new server. We can perform the upgrade for you at a rate of
>> $120/hr. The amount of time needed will depend largely on the
>> amount of data there is on your server.
>>
>> Let us know how you want to proceed.
>
> putting the "freak" into "control freak" since 1993
>

--
Regards,
Kevin


msbelle - Mar 02, 2007 5:57:37 pm PST #1113 of 4673
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

yeah, I don't really undertand all that, but it sounds like they have us over a barrel for some "complicated" work at $120/hour. Which, I must say, is a racket I'd like a part of.


§ ita § - Mar 02, 2007 6:21:11 pm PST #1114 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That's the basis of it. It has to be done, we can't do it, they charge $120/hr, and if my suspicions are correct, they won't have an estimate for how long it will take (the tech side of me is okay with that, but not the wallet side).