Don't know if you are still looking for bad statistical examples - but - there was recent survey headlined in parts of the U.S. press showing a 70% approval rating in India for the U.S.. Problems was that it was a telephone survey, and India still has a substantial percent of the population poor enough not own telephones. BTW it was a Pew study, Pew said upfront that they oversampled urban areas; so if the people conducting the survey disclose the problem is it still a problem? I guess it depends on whether you are looking for dishonesty or bad methology. Cause if disclosed it is not dishonest, but bad methodology is still bad methodology.
Simon ,'Objects In Space'
Natter 37: Oddly Enough, We've Had This Conversation Before.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
lkjasghda;k; g'lkagj
I think Jesse just broke.
Timelies, all.
Skipped, well, a lot. Including most of the previous Natter thread.
Hopefully no one else posted this already, but this made me laugh a lot:
Complete and Utter Idiot's Guide to Dungeons and Dragons.
I think Jesse just broke.
Or, or, Google got her!!!!
The Google overlord smote her.
t x-post!
Oh and in case the India thing is useful
[link] links to the main report
[link] where they disclose that in China, India and Pakistan groups sampled were disproportionately or exclusively urban.
The "50% Divorce Rate" stat is supposably a bad stat. According to my sociology prof many moons ago some news magazine divided the number of marriages in a year by tbe number of divorces in a year -- a method which did not take into account the existing marriages.
That's great, Kalshane. Thanks for the link.
Excellent! Yay links!
Alas, my "Edu" bookmarks folder is getting a little out of hand. Time to subdivide, I suppose. Much like my "Fanfic" folder.
t kicks old computer
Mine won't support Google Earth. Figures. Fucking Windows ME SUCKS ASS.