In general, I think we're okay as long as we're not making money off this.
(And as long as we don't send a copy to Cook's Illustrated with "CHECK OUT YOUR BROWNIE RECIPE ON PAGE FIVE!!!" written on the cover.)
Jayne ,'Out Of Gas'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
In general, I think we're okay as long as we're not making money off this.
(And as long as we don't send a copy to Cook's Illustrated with "CHECK OUT YOUR BROWNIE RECIPE ON PAGE FIVE!!!" written on the cover.)
My understanding is that even a slight change--e.g. rewording the instructions--is enough to get you past copyright issues on recipes.
"CHECK OUT YOUR BROWNIE RECIPE ON PAGE FIVE!!!"
I think you misspelled CHOCOLATE CUPCAKE.
Like, change all the t. measurements to "dash"?
That's my thinking too. We're a non-profit organization that's doing a fundraiser. I think as long as we list them as a source, we'll be fine.
Oh, was it cupcakes? Well, their brownies are good too.
Oh, was it cupcakes? Well, their brownies are good too.
It's all good. I just remember extended discussion in Natter about the CI cupcakes. This could be selective memory, though.
I'm looking at Mom Groups on MSN Groups. WTF is a SIGGIE?
I'm actually making the chocolate bundt cake right now from CI.
That's my thinking too. We're a non-profit organization that's doing a fundraiser. I think as long as we list them as a source, we'll be fine.
Um, no we're not. Mind, I think we're just fine with what we're doing here. But we're not a non-profit, and the proceeds are earmarked for us, no?