River ,'The Message'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I really do like the thought that even feral populations, given sufficient resources, will form loose social groupings similar to prides
This is currently in effect in my backyard.
That site...no words. TFU. Also, do they all have the same name, or is it the same girl-thing? They all pretty much look the same to me.
They all pretty much look the same to me
Isn't that what it's all about? Who cares about natural beauty when we can paint ourselves to look exactly alike.
I'll have you know that some friends were looking over my shoulder as I visited that site, and are now giving me looks of fear and possibly loathing. You have ruined my social life, ita. Ruined.
Also, $300 for the winning photo? So not going to cover the costs of the girl's therapy.
Mroning, Bitches.
Pictures=CREEPY.
How is everyone?
That site...no words. TFU.
Terrifyingly fucked up?
Wait, no, it's totally fucked up, isn't it. I am so smrt.
How is everyone?
Tired, as usual and strangely unmotivated. I'm the only one in the office right now and doing actual work seems pretty low on the list of things to do right now.
There has to be some special effect with the eyes. I don't care. Maybe it's not technically a retouch, but those are not human eyes. A child (even without a pound of make-up on, and I agree, that's a minimum guess at how much those baby doll kids are wearing) wouldn't need retouching, because there are no wrinkles, lines, etc.
It's just all so wrong. Wrong. Make it stop. Quick, let's talk about politics and religion.
I had an argument about circumcision last night. We could talk about that again. My opinion is that it's not something worth fighting over, but the girl I was arguing with thought that defending a child's foreskin was a vitally important battle.
Is it reversible? Could he have it reattached at eighteen?