Also, $300 for the winning photo? So not going to cover the costs of the girl's therapy.
Spike's Bitches 25 to Life
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Mroning, Bitches.
Pictures=CREEPY.
How is everyone?
That site...no words. TFU.
Terrifyingly fucked up?
Wait, no, it's totally fucked up, isn't it. I am so smrt.
How is everyone?
Tired, as usual and strangely unmotivated. I'm the only one in the office right now and doing actual work seems pretty low on the list of things to do right now.
There has to be some special effect with the eyes. I don't care. Maybe it's not technically a retouch, but those are not human eyes. A child (even without a pound of make-up on, and I agree, that's a minimum guess at how much those baby doll kids are wearing) wouldn't need retouching, because there are no wrinkles, lines, etc.
It's just all so wrong. Wrong. Make it stop. Quick, let's talk about politics and religion.
I had an argument about circumcision last night. We could talk about that again. My opinion is that it's not something worth fighting over, but the girl I was arguing with thought that defending a child's foreskin was a vitally important battle.
Is it reversible? Could he have it reattached at eighteen?
I think the lack of reversibility was one of the elements that made it worth the fight, for her.
We could talk about female circumcision for a change...
What is the evolutionary advantage of foreskin?