Now you can revise and make it sparkle. Also you should title it: The Jammy Todger (Or, Fay Said A Mouthful).

It's off with my amazing editors as I type. And sorry, not giving it either of those titles, silly Hec.

I gave up about, oh, 20 years ago on ever finding boots to fit my calves. I love the tall boots, but they are not for me. Dammit.

if I ever get an iPod I may call it The Jammy Todger.

Which boots are the sad-making ones, Nora? Not the CAT boots?

And sorry, not giving it either of those titles, silly Hec.

You suck! Just think how much it would brighten the day of your teacher. It's just pure selfishness on your part, placing your grade prospects over your teacher's entertainment.

Also, you should run the whole thing through Babelfish first. Into Esperanto. Then remove all the apostrophes and replace them with random diacritical marks. Then index everything but not alphabetically - by etymological chronology. So the oldest words in the English language come first.

There wasn't a Bitches 25 thread at 4:00+ AM my time. I know, because I checked before I went to bed.

Heh... I was like a dog who's food dish had been moved between 2 and 3 a.m. I kept coming back to the board thinking there would be a new thread. Stompies gotta sleep, too, I suppose.

Not touching the Weekly Reader link with a 10 foot pole. Nope. I need to preserve my childhood innocence.

Just got word from my friend. She's OK; she'd been shopping at that mall, but left a few minutes before the bombing.

-t, I hope your husband's family is alright.

My thoughts are with everyone there now.

Not the CAT boots?

Yes!

Poor woman has a hard enough time with regular English, Hec! That would be just cruel!

And, this paper doesn't really have any funnies for the prof, but my one from earlier today does.

My first reaction was -- (White font for decency) you stupid cocksucking bitch cunt from hell

But I'm not going to write that.

This is what I wrote instead:

Dear Ms. Hill,

I'm very confused by your recently editorial regarding Wyatt Sexton and I would appreciate some clarifcation.

First -- in your editorial you said "A few weeks ago, I wrote that it would be better if Sexton had a drug problem rather than an incurabel, but treatabel mental condition, such as bipolar disorder."

I was floored to read this. Completely struck dumb and then irate.

Exactly how would it be better? Are you saying that an incurable drug addiction (because there is no cure for drug addiction) is better than an illness that is treatable? I have biploar disorder, I'm on medication and I know that as long as I take my medication I will be stable. If, on the off chance, my medication doesn't work correctly I can go to the doctor and adjust my medication. There is no temptation to face daily, no desire to get high, no craving, no addiction. If this is your position -- that addiction is preferable to a treatable condition -- do you feel that way about all treatable but uncurable conditons? If Wyatt Sexton were diagonsised with Lupus or MS or diabetes would you say, also, that he would be better off a drug addict?

Or did you mean that there is less of a stigma attached to drug addiction? That the general public is more likely to understand and react sympathetically to addiction than it is towards mental illness? Because if that is the case then you are preputating the stigma.

I also take offense at your implication that maybe there is something more than Lyme Disease going on with Sexton, that maybe his family is using the excuse to hide something like drug addiction. (This is af

Finally I feel that you insulted all the residents of Tallahassee by saying that Sexton would not be accepted back here and imply that he should leave before he brings more shame to the Florida State program.