And what about transitive? Is that a=b implies a+c=b+c?
ETA: Of course I could google it. But I like talking to you people!
Wash ,'War Stories'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
And what about transitive? Is that a=b implies a+c=b+c?
ETA: Of course I could google it. But I like talking to you people!
Transitive is a=b and b=c -> a=c (or with < or > replacing the =s)
Hil is very clever. All I can think of when I see "commutative principle" is "What's purple and commutes?"
Ans: An Abelian grape
And that may well summarize What I Learned in Abstract Algebra.
Equality is transitive because a = b and b = c implies that a = c.
Okay, that's what I thought. So then what property is involved in the proof that a+z = b+z => a=b?
Ignoring the disturbing math talk, to say g'night. I'll be back tomorrow morning!
So then what property is involved in the proof that a+z = b+z => a=b?
Quite.
So then what property is involved in the proof that a+z = b+z => a=b?
I think that's the inverse property, since what you're doing there is adding the inverse of z to each side.
G'night, Erin!
Looking again at the question, I think they were looking for associative, for the step from (a+z)+-z=(b+z)+-z to a+(z+-z)=b+(z+-z). Interesting. I wouldn't have thought to make that two steps, but I guess it makes sense.
Anyway, thank you.
Dear Person,
If you can't help me with what I asked for, please call me and let me know. The reason I came to you, instead of my usual contact, was becuse I needed an answer today. If I wanted an answer tomorrow, I would have waited for my contact to get back in.
Dickhead.
Ta, Aimee, Your Neighborhood A/R Girl
Workweek Bunny Update:
Apparently the bunnies don't appear until after 3PM. I didn't see any until I was halfway done with my walk, and then I saw two. The work day I go for a walk and not see any bunnies will be a letdown.