Fandom has the advantage that you have an element of "why those people in that position?" even as it takes away your ability to decide for yourself who they are. But you can allude to a long history everyone shares with very little space. Symbolism takes on a whole new level.

My Big Bang story = done.

Apocrypha

117,000 words of John-centric gen that draws on stuff we learned all the way through S6. I've posted to AO3 as well as to JL.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go have a drink. I need one.

Heavens, Anne, that's a monster of a fic! Bookmarked.

Ooooh, 117K of John Winchester? I am SO all over that.

Bookmarked indeed.

::collapses::

In two days, I wrote 4100 words of a pinch-hit for a fic exchange. Go me.

Man, I hope the recipient doesn't hate it, but seriously I don't much care...

Apocrypha

YAY!!!!!

though now I feel bad I didn't do that last bit of stuff I said I would--I thought I had until Friday for some reason.

Thank you all very much! Now I have time to do things like read other people's stuff that I've been dying to read ::cough::Carpetbaggers::cough.

Perkins, no worries! I probably wasn't as clear as I should have been about my posting date being rescheduled. Your feedback was a HUGE help on this!

ita, I participated in the Star Trek reverse bang this year and last. For me, I didn't really care if there was conflict in the picture, but it had to have the pairing I wanted to write about displayed in it in some way, since anyone in the picture had to be in the story. And while there didn't have to be conflict, there did have to be some kind of clue as to the setting. For example, the artwork I claimed this year had Kirk, McCoy, Spock and Uhura in western style clothes, which suited what I wanted to write hugely, because I was working with a Firefly fusion.

A good friend of mine submitted a picture of Spock and McCoy flying a kite and the story that came out of that was simply amazing. So, conflict is not always necessary. The way the kite flying worked into the story was a splendid way to show how Spock's characterization didn't change across au settings, that he would always be a scientist and that it was a way for the two men to bond.

Do you think it's a problem if you're too specific? I don't mean ridiculously so, but the picture I'm thinking of, I'm not sure if I've seen these people together in a story before. So I'm kind of nervous, because no one will have a pre-existing idea they can fit to it, but I'd really like to think someone looked at it and thought "oh! how did that come to be?" or "what happens next?"

The other picture I'm doing is much more straightforward. Still not sure anyone will have any well-formed ideas to use for it, but it should be interesting not surprising.

Depends on what you mean by specific. I noticed with our last reverse bang that the pictures where folks were dressed in really fancy outfits (superhero, fantasy, etc) took longer to get picked, perhaps because it was too suggestive. More generic pictures tended to get picked first. Two or three characters at a table, in a car, walking down a street, playing musical instruments, can fit into almost any story. Last year the picture I had was of three people around a table, one sweating nervously, another with his head in his hands and a women pointing at him. Instant divorce!