My whole life, I've never loved anything else.

Oz ,'Him'


Fan Fiction II: Great story! Where's the sequel?

This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.


Fay - Jul 15, 2010 12:09:42 am PDT #6753 of 10434
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

Yes, Wart's a nod to TH White. Eh - I'm delighted you enjoyed it so much!

Sail, that vid was a rather surprising mesh of two different things, but I did laugh my ass off at the South Park section. Top banana!


erikaj - Jul 18, 2010 10:37:35 am PDT #6754 of 10434
Always Anti-fascist!

I still sort of find RPF embarrassing, but this person is a really good writer, and it's got KO, Rachel Maddow, New Orleans and enough subtext to float a barge. These are all things Buffistas like so I thought you'd like this, too. [link]


§ ita § - Jul 26, 2010 5:31:11 am PDT #6755 of 10434
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I just came across a fic that warned for het. Which always makes me roll my eyes, especially when the het pairs are listed in the pairings section (and pretty much canon, unlike the slash pairing).

But what I really wondered about was how the author listed the pairings. The men were separated with a slash (A/B) and the het pairs with a plus (A+C). Is there a fandom in which that's done conventionally?


Consuela - Jul 27, 2010 5:13:51 am PDT #6756 of 10434
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

I've been reading a lot of Narnia fic on FFN, where the characters are often listed as "Edmund Pevensie/Peter Pevensie", even when it's gen. I've seen the slash used that way occasionally before, but I've never seen anyone use the + as a romance indicator.


Laga - Jul 27, 2010 10:22:40 am PDT #6757 of 10434
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

huh. I'm under the impression that / always means sexuality.


Dana - Jul 27, 2010 10:28:01 am PDT #6758 of 10434
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Nothing is ever "always" in fandom (even when it should be). It's just too big.


§ ita § - Jul 28, 2010 2:03:05 pm PDT #6759 of 10434
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Jezebel reposts RPF, the crowd goes wild.

Interestingly enough, there are more "I read that/I do that" commenters than you get on IO9, where posters are mostly clueless or outright disdainful.

Still, a lot of "Freaks!" and the requisite "RP sex is squick! You people are sick!"


Dana - Jul 28, 2010 2:08:44 pm PDT #6760 of 10434
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

And of course someone mentions the Care Bears BDSM story. (I recognize the name of the commenter.)

Hey, ita, want a link to an Inception story? Arthur/Eames.

Edit: Whoops, never mind. If you read the stuff that smonster linked to in Natter, you're covered.


§ ita § - Jul 28, 2010 2:12:59 pm PDT #6761 of 10434
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Is that Care Bears story worth reading? Or should I file it with My Immortal and decide that just knowing the bare bones about its existence is enough?

I'm psyched to read smonster's links when I get home. I haven't wanted movie fic like this since The Losers.


Dana - Jul 28, 2010 2:18:57 pm PDT #6762 of 10434
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

I don't really see why you'd need to read the story if you don't want to. I never read it.