I think the nu!Kirk stuff is far more fresh in people's minds than the Krycek stuff, which is why Kirk is winning. Also, Tarsus IV! (Which is apparently fanon in the new fandom.)
I think there were no women because, hey, MANPAIN. Fans find manpain appealing, but womanpain NSM.
I think there were no women because, hey, MANPAIN. Fans find manpain appealing, but womanpain NSM.
There was Parker.
I enjoy manpain over most womanpain, because most (not all, but most) womanpain hits too close to the bone. Hell, it's been the big block for me in writing any serious always-a-girl Winchester stories. Remove the XY layer of abstraction for me from the worst of it, and I go sympathetic fetal.
I can't even write the word womanpain with the same nonchalance I write I write manpain. There's a gravity that's just not as fun.
Does Faith have a bad fanon childhood?
Faith has a fanon bad childhood. She is one of the womanpain! exceptions in fandom such as I've noticed.
Well, Faith had a bad canon childhood too, didn't she? At least according to her. She's not exactly a reliable narrator.
Most of the bad fanon childhoods have roots in canon. I mean, we know Pa Vecchio was up there with Wyndam-Pryce pere in terms of dicktasticness.
Faith's bad childhood gets a nod in canon, a stronger (more explicit) nod in some grey canon (official tie-in books), and a HUGE nod in fanon.
Canon was that Faith's mother was an alcoholic and left her unsupervised a lot, right?
I think there were no women because, hey, MANPAIN. Fans find manpain appealing, but womanpain NSM.
There was Parker
They've walked a strange and delicate line with Parker--her childhood pain has been played both for real sadness and for absolute hysterics. I think that helps her get on that list. Having herself buried alive by friends in order to get over claustrophobia? Blowing up her house? That's the kind of childhood trauma I can get behind. Starbuck is much more raw.