Support it or not, it kinda makes it explicit (okay, not enough for many purposes). DB can not want to say it as much as he wants. It doesn't make his character het.
When you look back at this, in the three seconds it'll take you to turn to dust, I think you'll find the mistake was touching my stuff.
Buffy ,'Lessons'
Fan Fiction II: Great story! Where's the sequel?
This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.
§ ita § - Jun 03, 2005 6:30:35 am PDT #241 of 10432
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Lee - Jun 03, 2005 6:38:05 am PDT #242 of 10432
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
Oh, I'm not saying the character was. Matt's original statement was that
On Angel it had the full, intentional support of all concerned from the top down.
I agree with everyone except maybe DB. Although he played along, he never seemed fully comfortable or supportive of it.
§ ita § - Jun 03, 2005 6:40:10 am PDT #243 of 10432
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Although he played along, he never seemed fully comfortable or supportive of it.
I was just commenting on the Angel is not gay denial -- comfortable or supportive or no -- Angel was intimate with Spike and it would have been weird for the actor to be denying it after those lines were delivered.
Lee - Jun 03, 2005 6:41:54 am PDT #244 of 10432
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
Oh. I think some of them were later, but I could be wrong.
Connie Neil - Jun 03, 2005 7:06:14 am PDT #245 of 10432
brillig
Angel may just object to the wording. Perhaps he prefers to be fey or something more from the Romantic era.
§ ita § - Jun 03, 2005 7:06:55 am PDT #246 of 10432
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Angel, or DB?
Connie Neil - Jun 03, 2005 7:08:08 am PDT #247 of 10432
brillig
Either. Both.
Though I've always admired DB's clothing optional tendencies, for what that's worth, relevance aside.
Ailleann - Jun 03, 2005 8:44:41 am PDT #248 of 10432
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
Perhaps it is Angelus that is the randy bugger, whereas Angel (a.k.a. Liam of the old skool Irish Catholic guilt, or equivalent) lumps "that one time" (or the many, many times) with Spike into the pile of Evil Things Angelus Did.
Or maybe he just doesn't want people to think that the poncy hair is actually his.
Connie Neil - Jun 03, 2005 8:46:05 am PDT #249 of 10432
brillig
I'm with Ailleann. That's the sort of thing Angelus would do and Angel would feel wretchedly guilty for thinking about often.
Lee - Jun 03, 2005 9:03:18 am PDT #250 of 10432
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
Angel, or DB?
I was focusing on DB. I agree that Angelus seems more omnisexual than Angel.