Orson Scott Card: "Star Trek's icky! Why don't you like my stuff the way you like Star Trek! But only weird people like Star Trek, so I don't want you liking my stuff."
What Happens in Natter 35 Stays in Natter 35
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Which was a shame, because science fiction writing was incredibly fertile at the time, with writers like Harlan Ellison and Ursula LeGuin, Robert Silverberg and Larry Niven, Brian W. Aldiss and Michael Moorcock, Ray Bradbury and Isaac Asimov, and Robert A. Heinlein and Arthur C. Clarke creating so many different kinds of excellent science fiction that no one reader could keep track of it all.
Harlan Ellison, of course, wrote for Star Trek, although he certainly wasn't pleased with the results.
I hope it works for people. It's an interesting piece, though I fail to see the motivation for writing it.
Interesting view from a guy (Card) who stopped being "relevant" to science fiction twenty years ago himself.
Whedon's "Firefly" showed us that even 1930s sci-fi can be well acted and tell a compelling long-term story.
I wish it had had a chance to tell a long-term story.
ho stopped being "relevant" to science fiction twenty years ago himself.
No kidding. I loved him ... and then ... ick. I'd rather watch boring Trek than keep reading him.
Whedon's "Firefly" showed us that even 1930s sci-fi can be well acted and tell a compelling long-term story.
What does he mean by "1930s sci-fi"?
At assemblies at Ben and Julia's school, the teachers and parent-helpers will clap like: Clap Clap Clapclapclap.
Emmett's teacher claps three times, and then all the students stop what they're doing immediately and clap three times and it's instant order. It's pretty cool.
Much better than my teacher who slammed a ruler on her desk with a loud crack.
Harlan Ellison, of course, wrote for Star Trek, although he certainly wasn't pleased with the results.
Paid for his house though.
What does he mean by "1930s sci-fi"?
Space Opera, I think.
Here's what I think: Most people weren't reading all that brilliant science fiction. Most people weren't reading at all. So when they saw "Star Trek," primitive as it was, it was their first glimpse of science fiction. It was grade school for those who had let the whole science fiction revolution pass them by.
Wow. Condescending much?
What does he mean by "1930s sci-fi"?
He made the same reference about Star Trek (TOS), which is probably a reference to 30's sci-fi like Flash Gordon. Impossible scientific wonders rather than hard science (fiction) realities which Card probably tries to adhere to more.
eta: nah, I don't buy that.
Our quiet thing at summer camp was that the counselor raised his/her hand and then the kids raised theirs -- and if your hand was up your mouth was shut.