I just figured, like, the more plausible explanation (based on ita's description) was a permanent ball-scratching-limitation
But if we read it like Steph did (and as I did) that it's a straight swap, the dog isn't retaliating with permanent ball-scratching limiting, so I don't think it's at all required.
Quite simply -- you used a cone to prevent me from playing with my balls, and here's my tit-for-tat.
eventually, you're gonna be able to take the constricting garment off, and do all the scratching you want
Dogs and genitalia -- not two (separate, COMPLETELY separate) areas where eventually is much comfort.
Quite simply -- you used a cone to prevent me from playing with my balls, and here's my tit-for-tat.
Proving that jokes lose all power of funniness once they have to be explained.
Quite simply -- you used a cone to prevent me from playing with my balls, and here's my tit-for-tat.
So we've moved on to pre-op trannies now, have we?
Proving that jokes lose all power of funniness once they have to be explained.
Well, at least the egg one (by far my favourite of the two) is okay.
I saw one of his cartoons with a huge egg banging the hell out of a chicken, and the caption "Who came first?"
This reminds me of a tee shirt a friend of mine used to have the had a drawing of a large, hairy penis with legs chasing a large, hairy vagina with legs, and a caption that said "One fucking thing after another."
I doubt it was the same cartoonist, though. I think that tee was hand made by a friend of his.
Should there be a male term for tit-for-tat?
Both cartoons sound like something from
The Far Side,
by Gary Larson.
Nah, they don't sound at all Larsonesque to me. (Now, if they were
cows...
)
