Alias was good. But, sarameg, I don't find it as insubstantially plotted and eyerolly as you. Cause really? I'm just in it for the pretty. And this week. Lots of great dialoge.

MEEP! Today was due day for the applications to go to England and Ireland for my students. Already, I have 12 students signed up and I still have to see the other class! What's exciting is the thought of taking kids to see really cool stuff, esp. since so few of them have opportunities to explore life outside their ghetto. But I'm sort of in awe of how difficult it will be to do fundraising.

Gulp.

Thanks for all the vibes and ~ma everyone. Dad is doing well and likely to get to go home tomorrow. I appreciate the kind thoughts so much.

Dad is doing well and likely to get to go home tomorrow

Hubby's been in an out of the hospital for these things in one day--granted we went in at 3 AM and were home by the evening news, but one day is one day.

It just amazes me that something that involved multi-day stays in major care sections twenty years ago can be dealt with so simply now.

Cause really? I'm just in it for the pretty.

I think this may have been my problem. For some inexplicable reason, I was actually paying attention, which I have to admit I mostly don't. Usually, it's for the the wigs and booms. I probably should have been watching Frontline instead.

At what point does something cease being derivative and becomes simply a part of culture?

90+ years after it is published, or after enough change to the original that it is considered a different work. Copyright isn't like the Kleenex or Aspirin trademark; it's still under ownership until the right expires or is specifically waived.

Which is to say, you can refer to a copyrighted thing for free, but actually quoting from it is where the money comes in. If the actors in Reign of Fire had actually called the black knight Darth Vader, and recited text word-for-word, some lawyer somewhere would at least have had impure thoughts about royalty payments. But because it was vagued up so much, it shared more in common with Star Wars's not-copyrightable sources than with Star Wars.

Every time somebody on a movie screen sings "Happy Birthday," some foundation in the midwest gets a HUGE fee. Yes, "Happy Birthday" is under copyright protection, and the owners of that right charge massive amounts for each use in print or other media.

MALORY: I think it's sweet that you and your partner sing to each other on television. Others may think it's vaguely gay, but I disagree.

DAN: Thank you.

MALORY: Nonetheless, you can't do it anymore.

DAN: Why not?

MALORY: It's against the law.

DAN: It's against the law to be vaguely gay?

***

DAN: It's against the law to sing "Happy Birthday" on television?

MALORY: Federal copyright law.

DAN: "Happy Birthday" is protected material?

MALORY: Yes.

DAN: Who holds the copyright on "Happy Birthday"?

MALORY: Mildred and Patty Hill.

DAN: Who are they?

MALORY: The authors?

DAN: The authors.

MALORY: They wrote it.

DAN: They wrote the song.

MALORY: Did you think that song just happened?

DAN: Well...yeah.

but actually quoting from it is where the money comes in

But it has to be a relatively substantial quote. I don't think you can be sued just for having a character say "Luke, I am your father."

Every time somebody on a movie screen sings "Happy Birthday," some foundation in the midwest gets a HUGE fee.

This is why so many movies have characters singing "For S/He's a Jolly Good Fellow" instead.

From the "I Really Don't Want To Be At Work Today" files, here is a Wooden iPod Case

I find the political controversy about Star Wars III kinda funny.

[link]

I believe the conservative site "Free Republic" is also calling for a boycott since they consider Lucas anti-american.

"Free Republic" is also calling for a boycott

Yeah, good luck with that.