Zombies! Hyena people! Snyder!

Student ,'Touched'


What Happens in Natter 35 Stays in Natter 35  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


tommyrot - May 18, 2005 10:01:43 am PDT #5292 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

If we lose the filibuster option then the party with 51 votes gets their way on every damn thing.

But the change will be limited to the confirmation of judges.

Supposedly.

At least, that's what they say. But it could be a slippery sloap to eliminating the filibuster for everything.


Gudanov - May 18, 2005 10:01:57 am PDT #5293 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping

What it comes down to is that there are 10 judical nominees that the Democrats are threatening to fillibuster (out of like 205), if the rules are changed these nominees will be approved.

However, this is oftened considered to be more about a future Supreme Court nominee than the current nominees.


Emily - May 18, 2005 10:02:57 am PDT #5294 of 10001
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola

Allyson, are you making up your own steps, in the defiance of all authority figures who say the Bogo Pogo's the only way to go? Sigh. Don't you know there are no new steps?


tommyrot - May 18, 2005 10:03:20 am PDT #5295 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

So their assumption is that they'll have the majority 4evah?

That's just silly.

Yeah. Although their plan is to have the majority 4evah. A lot of their proposed policies are supposedly geared towards crippling the Democrats in elections....


Topic!Cindy - May 18, 2005 10:04:29 am PDT #5296 of 10001
What is even happening?

At least, that's what they say. But it could be a slippery sloap to eliminating the filibuster for everything.

Which is what Senate Democrats (including my own Senators) tried to do, back in 96, or so.


Gudanov - May 18, 2005 10:04:36 am PDT #5297 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping

So their assumption is that they'll have the majority 4evah?

I think it's being done for immediate political gain. The republican leader in the Senate (Bill Frist) is wanting to mount a presidential run in '08 and is under a lot of pressure from the religious right to make this move.


Laura - May 18, 2005 10:04:50 am PDT #5298 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

What it comes down to is that there are 10 judical nominees that the Democrats are threatening to fillibuster

Of course they blocked like 60 of Clinton's. Yes, this is very shortsighted since I fully expect the Republicans to lose their power position. (And don't dare disagree with me)


Jesse - May 18, 2005 10:05:03 am PDT #5299 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

So their assumption is that they'll have the majority 4evah?

Yes, that.

I wonder if Cobert's thing about congress's "separation... and POWER" is still on line.


Gudanov - May 18, 2005 10:08:43 am PDT #5300 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping

Which is what Senate Democrats (including my own Senators) tried to do, back in 96, or so.

A few of them anyway. In this case, there's a pretty decent chance it will happen. I don't think they ever had the numbers back then.


shrift - May 18, 2005 10:11:46 am PDT #5301 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

I made it to the post office this afternoon. It took me 45 minutes to mail 3 packages. I forgot that it was passport season. Grr. Next time I bring my own packaging and use the automated doohickey.