this is what happens when I go to lunch.
Multiple orgasms? Lucky girl.
BK. Have it your way.
Hmm. The creepy BK king-guy from the commercials is seeming less creepy in that light....
Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.
Mal ,'Serenity'
What Happens in Natter 35 Stays in Natter 35
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Steph L. - May 17, 2005 9:01:08 am PDT #4865 of 10001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine
§ ita § - May 17, 2005 9:02:06 am PDT #4866 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
From britannica.com:
Once the female attains an orgasm, however, she remains sexually excited longer and may experience several successive orgasms, whereas the male is ordinarily unable to experience a second orgasm except after a waiting period
The resolution stage in men contains a refractory period of several minutes to a few hours, during which the man is incapable of further sexual arousal. Women have no such refractory period and can quickly become aroused again from any point in the resolution stage
Connie Neil - May 17, 2005 9:02:19 am PDT #4867 of 10001
brillig
Is no one else seeing nifty correlations between intermingled discussions of chaos theory and multiple orgasms? It means something.
I mean, something other than that I love all the spicy brains around here.
-t - May 17, 2005 9:02:34 am PDT #4868 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Hm. I had BK for lunch. I guess I didn't order right.
Jesse - May 17, 2005 9:03:11 am PDT #4869 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Hmm. The creepy BK king-guy from the commercials is seeming less creepy in that light....
EW! MORE CREEPY! MORE CREEPY! No way I'm having sex with the scary plastic-headed king, no matter how many orgasms.
Gudanov - May 17, 2005 9:03:37 am PDT #4870 of 10001
Coding and Sleeping
'Cuz most people still don't know what actuaries are.
Just another word for accountant.
Just Kidding
Emily - May 17, 2005 9:04:15 am PDT #4871 of 10001
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
I find 13% rather low, honestly... but have no real statistical evidence to back that up (except, it seems strange that it would have such a presence in the cultural consciousness with such a low incidence). Also, ah, Freud. You damage-causing little fucker. "Adolescent phenomenon," indeed.
Mr. Broom - May 17, 2005 9:04:38 am PDT #4872 of 10001
"When I look at people that I would like to feel have been a mentor or an inspiring kind of archetype of what I'd love to see my career eventually be mentioned as a footnote for in the same paragraph, it would be, like, Bowie." ~Trent Reznor
Hmm. The creepy BK king-guy from the commercials is seeming less creepy in that light....
Yeah, that idea just put me off sex forever. Okay, for the next five minutes.
Connie Neil - May 17, 2005 9:06:54 am PDT #4873 of 10001
brillig
LONDON (Reuters) - British soldiers serving in Iraq crashed defense ministry computers in London last week after officials downloaded a spoof video the troops had made of a chart-topping song. The soldiers' four-minute video take of the 1971 hit "Is This The Way To Amarillo" had officers laughing out loud back at London headquarters as they e-mailed copies to each other. "The video is really good," a military spokesman said on Tuesday.
Emily - May 17, 2005 9:07:08 am PDT #4874 of 10001
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
may experience several successive orgasms,
My question then, I guess, is whether it needs to be, er, pop-pop-pop, as this entry makes it sound, to be considered multiple orgasms, rather than renewed arousal after a short recovery period?
Is this question making sense to anyone else?
Also, -t, the book is as much DFW as it is mathematical history (which is part of what made me love it so much). There's plenty of room for another one that's not Foster Wallace-y! Just look at how many books have been published about zero.