I played the Google game twice, and got about half of the same ones again the second time.
You're talking to Serenity. And, Early... Serenity is very unhappy.
River ,'Objects In Space'
Natter 34: Freak With No Name
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Apr 26, 2005 8:17:04 am PDT #8939 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Calli - Apr 26, 2005 8:25:09 am PDT #8940 of 10001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs
Maybe I could try to bribe myself to work by promising myself shoes...
Sometimes that's the only reason I go to the office. Well, usually it's books. Hardcover. But still.
re: kid clothes and dirt. I used to live about two blocks from a woodsy-swampy area. I was a girly girl who wanted to wear the frilliest dresses possible, strap on a sword, and go to the swamp to hunt dragons. You know, girl stuffTM. Mom and Dad had no problem with me getting covered in mud, but they insisted I put on jeans and t-shirts first.
ChiKat - Apr 26, 2005 8:25:20 am PDT #8941 of 10001
That man was going to shank me. Over an omelette. Two eggs and a slice of government cheese. Is that what my life is worth?
ChiKat, I am SO getting that shirt! In red.
Isn't it great?? I wanted to get it in red, but they don't make it big enough to fit me. Blech.
Hey! Those shirts were originally designed as a fundraiser for my library school. MJ graduated last year or two years ago.
How cool! I love those shirts!
I tried playing the Google game but kept getting interrupted (see: above t-shirt) with stoopid questions. (Not stoopid so much as they could look it up themselves.)
Kathy A - Apr 26, 2005 8:28:31 am PDT #8942 of 10001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil
Question for the Nilly-minded amongst us. Remember a few weeks or so ago after Rio announced her engagement, when we were linking to pretty engagement rings? What was the website that had all those gorgeous antique rings?
§ ita § - Apr 26, 2005 8:31:31 am PDT #8943 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The bling discussion starts here: Rio "Natter 33 1/3" Mar 11, 2005 8:40:49 pm PST, Kathy. Not sure which site you liked.
-t - Apr 26, 2005 8:32:40 am PDT #8944 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
I was a girly girl who wanted to wear the frilliest dresses possible, strap on a sword, and go to the swamp to hunt dragons.
This is my niece. She climbs trees and stuff in her flower girl dress. And why shouldn't she? It's not like she'll be required to wear it ever again to some fancy occasion
Kathy A - Apr 26, 2005 8:42:24 am PDT #8945 of 10001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil
Thanks, ita! It was the faycullen.com site that I was remembering. Love the Edwardian rings.
Aims - Apr 26, 2005 8:43:54 am PDT #8946 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
![[link]](http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/aimeeconat/detail?.dir=2180&.dnm=cbb4.jpg){kind=link}
amych - Apr 26, 2005 8:47:59 am PDT #8947 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
You are not boring, and the wee one is gloriously pwetty.
Sue - Apr 26, 2005 8:50:32 am PDT #8948 of 10001
hip deep in pie
She has just long delicate fingers, aimee. Gorgeous!