Oh my god. What can it be? We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.

Wash ,'Bushwhacked'


Natter 34: Freak With No Name  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


sumi - Apr 25, 2005 5:01:55 am PDT #8650 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

Trudy -- yes, the aesthetics. . . I wonder how Dr. Bailey will react if/when she discovers the Burke/Yang relationship. Given that she kind of blackmails Shepard -- according to the promo.


Frankenbuddha - Apr 25, 2005 5:25:55 am PDT #8651 of 10001
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

Timelies and a cartful of gronk. Not a good weekend (personally speaking). Again. Meh - very tired of this. Plus the insomnia fairy thought last night was a good time to visit.

Now for my next trick, I fall asleep at my desk.


tommyrot - Apr 25, 2005 5:37:23 am PDT #8652 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'

LONDON, England -- Workers distracted by phone calls, e-mails and text messages suffer a greater loss of IQ than a person smoking marijuana, a British study shows.

The article says that the IQ of the test subjects was tested periodically during the day. I wonder how they did that.

OK, does this next sentence make any sense?

Nine out of 10 people thought colleagues who answered messages during face-to-face meetings were rude, while three out of 10 believed it was not only acceptable, but a sign of diligence and efficiency.

So there were some people who thought it both rude and acceptable and the sign of diligence and efficiency?


Nora Deirdre - Apr 25, 2005 5:39:31 am PDT #8653 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

I think I'd do better on the job if I were high on pot. I'd cry a lot less from anxiety, that's for sure.

Ah well. Not going to test that theory though, however tempting.


brenda m - Apr 25, 2005 5:42:28 am PDT #8654 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Nine out of 10 people thought colleagues who answered messages during face-to-face meetings were rude,

I do that to a colleague when I'm trying to get him to shut up, so I'd have to say they're right on the money.


Theodosia - Apr 25, 2005 5:52:55 am PDT #8655 of 10001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

Depends on how the phone call is answered, too -- do they excuse themselves, are they expected to be responsible for some ongoing crisis no matter what they're doing, et cetera? If it's a work beeper or cell, I'd say they're diligent.

Now back to work getting highanswering my email....


Dana - Apr 25, 2005 6:00:01 am PDT #8656 of 10001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Dana, try this one. [link] They include a decent outline of their criteria, but I didn't see if they listed scores.

Thanks, I'll check it out.


Nutty - Apr 25, 2005 6:03:56 am PDT #8657 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

The article says that the IQ of the test subjects was tested periodically during the day. I wonder how they did that.

I am thinking, your average IQ battery is not exactly the kind of thing you can test 10 times a day, like your blood sugar. It takes a while, you know?

Now, speed on particular cognitive tests I could buy, since being distracted (e.g. by email) could slow you down on thinking tasks, but speediness of response in any given context is not equal to IQ. Also, it's not groundbreaking to say that being pecked at by several communications methods at once makes one distracted. Anybody who has tripped while talking on a cell phone could tell you that.


Stephanie - Apr 25, 2005 6:05:25 am PDT #8658 of 10001
Trust my rage

re: Grey's Anatomy my thoughts were exactly what Trudy said regarding the Burke/Yang kiss. Personally, I think the resident (forgot her name) will not be happy to find out about Dr. Burke kissing anyone but her, maybe .


sumi - Apr 25, 2005 6:07:57 am PDT #8659 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

The resident is Dr. Bailey -- that was my thought too. If she felt like she had an opportunity for leverage with the discovery of Shepard/Grey, she is just going to be ANGRY when/if she discovers the Burke/Yang. But I'll be she'll use it as leverage too.