Nice acronym, Mom!

Buffy ,'Showtime'


Natter 34: Freak With No Name  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


ChiKat - Apr 23, 2005 10:21:08 am PDT #8427 of 10001
That man was going to shank me. Over an omelette. Two eggs and a slice of government cheese. Is that what my life is worth?

Me, too, Cindy! I'm dyin' to know. (okay, not really dying, but you get the idea)


sumi - Apr 23, 2005 10:24:17 am PDT #8428 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

Cindy -- that's exactly how I felt! They really set up something good for next season. . . if it happens. Oh, and when she was talking to (I think) Ghost!Judith at the high school and she (the ghost) walks through the trophy case and Joan winds up talking to the Trophy Case, I immediately thought about Elizabeth Madison (Amy's Mom).


Narrator - Apr 23, 2005 10:49:19 am PDT #8429 of 10001
The evil is this way?

My VCR decided not to tape "Joan of Arcadia" last night. I suspect that it is in league with the devil.


sarameg - Apr 23, 2005 11:26:31 am PDT #8430 of 10001

So I did manage to go to the buy-in-baltimore place today. And they were very helpful, if swamped, so I didn't get to meet with the lender guy or agent, but the manager gave me some new neighborhood info. And she's my age and "style" and recently bought her first home so I didn't get all heebiejeebies. And I helped her talk up Hampden for a couple who could afford it. So that was cool. There's a crash-course/networking thing tuesday night that I hope to go to. And there is a thing in May for the westside (if you find and close on something something like 90 days post attendence, this grant throws the first 50 buyers $3k ) which isn't of as much interest to me but you never know.

Anyway, it was all very interesting and

AM I FUCKING NUTS?!!!GOODGOD.

Yeah, so. Hair trimmed and I need to put together a grocery list and go do that. Then at least one load of spring cleaning laundry.


Gus - Apr 23, 2005 11:55:16 am PDT #8431 of 10001
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Dang. I started a thing with my blather about buy -vs- rent, then went off to fly kites and be otherwise irresponsible.

Maybe I'm smarter than I look.

Cindy's breakdown was very good. It seemed that possibly there was a soft spot around the assumption that rent would have doubled over the period. A 20% increase per year (over initial rent) over five years, however, could cause this. Is that a common practise?

My experience: First home after college dorms (and the rent there just sucked!) was a mobilehome on a rented lot. The "house" was paid for in toto out of savings on odd jobs, and my first year of real employment.

Lot rental was like esspresso-money. The sale of the mobilehome and further savings over a year bought outright a three-person house in the Lake Como area of Saint Paul (middle eco-strata, clean, not quite suburban, not quite urban).

The property appreciated, due in no small part to my late wife's assiduous involvement in community issues, over the next five years. Banking a fair rental/mortgage fee for that house in a nolo me tangere account during that period netted enough to buy a three-garage thing in Woodbury (decidely suburban, decidely upscale). Ten years of savings there bought a farm in Wisconsin (from a relative, but at fair market value), for a "get-away".

Sale of the Woodbury place brought independence from the corporate masters...

Anyway. The main point is that we accepted less "lifestyle" than we could afford using credit, until we could afford to own it outright.


tavella - Apr 23, 2005 12:28:38 pm PDT #8432 of 10001
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.

Anyway. The main point is that we accepted less "lifestyle" than we could afford using credit, until we could afford to own it outright.

Yes, but that's an ideological choice, not a financial one. Basically the formula is

if: (rent over period of saving + price of house) > (price of house + total interest + property taxes - amount mortgage tax break - appreciation) then: take out loan to buy house

For most people in most markets, this is true. It's not true for everyone; buying at the top of a bubble is bad. And there's a lot of other vague factors, too. How stable your job prospects are, whether you are likely to move within a few years, if you are good at repairs and home improvements or not.


Thomash - Apr 23, 2005 12:30:27 pm PDT #8433 of 10001
I have a plan.

So, Empire Strikes Back is on TV right now. Man, that Han Solo, is there nothing he can't do?

ouch,

oh,

eeww,

Man, that Chewbaka, is there nothing he can't do?


SailAweigh - Apr 23, 2005 12:33:23 pm PDT #8434 of 10001
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

It's not true for everyone; buying at the top of a bubble is bad

I'm sure this is true to an extent. I'd say Madison is at the top of it's bubble. Housing here has been appreciating at over 8% per year for the last 3 years or more. My rent only went up $80 over 4 years, approximately 12% total. What made the difference to me was mortgage rates. I got a WI VA loan at 5.35%. Very hard to beat. Plus, by the time I'm ready to sell, I'll have beaucoup equity because I put nearly $20k down when I bought.


Gus - Apr 23, 2005 12:36:19 pm PDT #8435 of 10001
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

tavella: loving the tagline.

As for the rest ... Yes. Do the arithmetic. If the play looks good, go for it, but first do the arithmetic.

Man, that Chewbaka, is there nothing he can't do?

Opera.


Thomash - Apr 23, 2005 12:40:33 pm PDT #8436 of 10001
I have a plan.

Opera.

You've never hear his 'Rrrgh, Rrrrgh'?

Arm rippingly wonderful.