By not applying the idea of creating an "other" to hate being a bad thing to the groups he marginalizes.

Do you think he's creating an "other" to hate, or that he's preaching the doctrine he believes is true. I'm not Catholic, and don't plan to become one, so I have nothing personal at stake in this conversation, as there is plenty of Roman Catholic doctrine I feel is in error. And that's kind of my point, I guess. I am not a Catholic, and I could go through the Catechism, if I could be arsed to do so, and tell you where I think Catholic doctrine is wrong. Would that make me a hater, or one who promotes hate? How is it different from what we're doing now (except of course, that we're only talking to each other--and don't have the attention of the world--yet).

This was an Xpost of the --I was very much trying to say what bon bon said, so much better-- variety.

He can't have said autoerotic. That's just icky. But I'd love to see him explain why Hinduism offers more false hope than Christianity. And more cruel concepts.

Oh, this is effin' brilliant.

I married him for his way with words.

Which is actually mostly true. During our early dating, we got to see each other at most once a month, but we wrote each other lengthy letters as fast as the Royal Mail would turn them around. If they hadn't been good letters, I doubt we would've stuck with each other.

I know that in Catholic hospitals that's what doctors have to do -- they can't prescribe birth control, but they can give the Pill for "irregular periods" or some such

FWIW, my doctor is affiliated with Georgetown University Hospital, which is Catholic, and she prescribed the pill as contraception. Maybe it makes a difference that I'm married (though it shouldn't), or maybe this depends on the hospital and the doctor.

Edit: LJ, I should have said in my anecdotal experience.

But I'd love to see him explain why Hinduism offers more false hope than Christianity. And more cruel concepts.

Because Christianity's true, silly. Also, God only hurts with love.

Actually, seriously, could you have someone heading the Church who didn't believe it was the One True Faith?

He can't have said autoerotic. That's just icky. But I'd love to see him explain why Hinduism offers more false hope than Christianity. And more cruel concepts.

Yeah, I don't get autoerotic in that context. I think he would probably say that all religions that are not Catholic offer false hope because Catholicism is right.

could you have someone heading the Church who didn't believe it was the One True Faith?

No, but identifying enemies isn't a requirement of belief is it?

Actually, seriously, could you have someone heading the Church who didn't believe it was the One True Faith?

I do think it's possible to believe yours is the One True Faith without going out of your way to explicitly demonize others. It's possible to say "Here are all the things I think are nifty about Jesus" without tacking on, "And here's why Buddhism sucks."

Ratzzinger's nickname was "Cardinal No," and he's very conservative.

But does he have a hairless cat? Yes, I know I am mixing my Bond villains.

I think electing that dude pope is the same thing, metaphorically, as electing Bob Dole president. Like, the skills of being a party apparatchik and attack dog are not the same skills that persuade people whom you don't already have by the short-and-curlies. And that is before you get to talking about yourself in the third person.

As for his being the head of the Inquisition, well, George Bush I was head of the CIA for a while, before he became Veep and then president. Which is a nice datum for the Lefty Paranoiacs Organizational Front newsletter, but didn't turn out to tell us anything about how he would govern the country.

I was ignoring the "enemies" part for the moment and focusing on the "false" part. But I can imagine a less-martial definition of enemy -- these are the forces that will encourage people away from Catholicism.