One presumes that people just rattling off digits is even less reliably random than a computer doing it.
"1, 2, 3, 4... DAMMIT!"
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
One presumes that people just rattling off digits is even less reliably random than a computer doing it.
"1, 2, 3, 4... DAMMIT!"
Mmm....Pi.....
is it even possible to create long strings of truly random numbers?
Yip. The standard method used to be measuring radioactive decay; dunno what it is nowadays.
is it even possible to create long strings of truly random numbers?
I read a short story once where a guy, trying to talk to God, hooked up a letter-generating computer program to the random decay of Plutonium atoms. After a while, God called him up and told him to lay off with the pressure because it was annoying.
Eh, he's an old man. Giving him a boost up is the polite thing to do.
Okay, now I'm wondering if this comment makes DX more hell-bound, or less....
DX, you're Catholic, right?
You mean like, Pi?
Like the book, it's a fixed set, and becomes semi-unrandom.
After a while, God called him up and told him to lay off with the pressure because it was annoying.
BWAHAHAHA!
you're sposed to flip to a random page
But then you're doing the work!
Actually, you can't flip to a random page, because of the nature of book bindings. You're much more likely to flip to the dead middle than to pages on the extremes, and over time the binding becomes creased and naturally opens to specific sections
Like the book, it's a fixed set, and becomes semi-unrandom.
It's fixed, but it's infinitely long so you can always just move down to an as yet unused stretch of randomosity. Like the Mad Hatter's tea party.