I'll go out and see an "event" picture. So I can't blame theater owners for ignoring an "improvised" low-budg movie with no stars (or actors, for that matter) or marketing. That's aside from the fact that they are being asked to buy a nonexclusive license that is part of an experiment with a strategy that hurts their entire business model. Smooth move, Magnolia. I'll remember that if I'm ever asked to pay for something practically worthless in order to make it easier for non-market participants to take my piece of the pie.

I can't blame theater owners for ignoring an "improvised" low-budg movie with no stars (or actors, for that matter) or marketing

Absolutely. The concurrent release thing--maybe if Peter Jackson asked them to do it, but why this?

For me it depends a lot on the movie. Brokeback Mountain, with all those sweeping vista shots and such, was something I wanted to see on a big screen. Likewise Serenity or any other SF movie with space battles.

Character-driven slices of life set in a Duluth office? I generally figure they won't lose much going to the smaller screen. I'll still shell out the bucks to see them in the theater if it's a social thing--catching a movie with my friends and all that. But I don't feel that I'm gaining much of anything as far as experiencing the movie.

Brokeback Mountain, with all those sweeping vista shots and such, was something I wanted to see on a big screen.

Sue, Ouise, Elena and I went to see Bareback Brokeback Mountain last night. I loved the scenes with the sweeping scenery and the sheep the best and could have watched a whole movie about Cowboy Love set in that time period. Once they left the mountain, I felt the movie dragged and once something finally happened it was anticlimactic.

Elena wondered if the flash to the beating death of Jack was what really happened or was just what Ennis thought happened. I tend to believe the former.

I've said it before, I'd be much more willing to go see movies in the theatre if I didn't have to worry about having to enjoy the movie despite the audience. Too many people treat the movie theatre as if it was their own living room. I'll still shell out the money for something that needs to be seen on the big screen, but generally those movies are loud enough the screaming babies, cellphone users and talkbackers are mostly drowned out.

Character-driven slices of life set in a Duluth office? I generally figure they won't lose much going to the smaller screen.

I try to see smaller movies in theatres as early in their run as possible, just to boost their box office. (I know my one ticket isn't going to make a difference in the larger scheme of things, but psychologically, it makes me good about supporting smaller films.)

I sort of have to do that as a matter of course, since if I don't see the Garden States and Mysterious Skins in the first week I'll have to wait til they come out on DVD.

The pressure to do so for Brokeback Mountain eased a bit considering I still haven't been able to get a ticket to a showing. I suspect it's going to outlast the current blockbusters at the cinema that's showing it here.

Jessica is me, except that I've been so poor over the last two years, that even most blockbusters weren't enough to get me into the theater.

That's hopefully changeing now, and I'll be able to get back into the theaters for small films.

There's a Spike and Mike's out here in a small arthouse, and I've got to see it while it's here. I've been a Spike and Mike's fan forever.

It's a good time to be a film fan in NYC.

IFC Center is doing a Lars Von Trier series this month, including BOTH Kingdom 1 and 2!! I'm also excited about seeing Zentropa on the big screen, finally.

Also, BAM Rose Cinemas just started their Month of Malick, which gives me an excuse to see the recut New World and see how it compares to the one I saw last month.

Disney in talks to buy Pixar

Steve Jobs would become the largest individual shareholder in Disney, and would likely have a seat on the board of directors.