It's called a blaster, Will, a word that tends to discourage experimentation. Now, if it were called the Orgasmater, I'd be the first to try your basic button press approach.

Xander ,'Get It Done'


Buffista Movies 4: Straight to Video  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Matt the Bruins fan - Nov 21, 2005 7:53:39 am PST #8733 of 10002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

You do know that the UK has a different age of consent, right? They're not doing anything illegal over there.

The resources I was able to find indicated that 16 + 23 = jailtime in Britain if the parents press the issue. But if the relationship isn't, no worries.


§ ita § - Nov 21, 2005 8:00:42 am PST #8734 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

You could get married at age 16 when I lived in London. I checked ageofconsent.com (why isn't that blocked at work?), and they quote:

Age of consent for sexual activity
The legal age of consent for sexual activity is sixteen (16) years, but eighteen (16) years for homosexual males.

Age of consent for marriage
The legal age of consent for marriage is sixteen (16) years.

There's more here


tommyrot - Nov 21, 2005 8:02:51 am PST #8735 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

eighteen (16)

?


Frankenbuddha - Nov 21, 2005 8:04:03 am PST #8736 of 10002
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

The legal age of consent for sexual activity is sixteen (16) years, but eighteen (16) years for homosexual males.

Looks like they're trying to generate some sexual ambivalence here.


tommyrot - Nov 21, 2005 8:05:04 am PST #8737 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Or else 16 is eighteen in gay-years.


Jars - Nov 21, 2005 8:06:34 am PST #8738 of 10002

The age of consent got equalised for homosexual males a couple of years back. And as far as I know, once you're sixteen, you can do what, or rather who, you like, regardless of parental consent.


§ ita § - Nov 21, 2005 8:07:28 am PST #8739 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If you read the link, which seems more recent, you get this:

The Act makes three changes to the law on sexual offences. First, it reduces the minimum age at which a person, whether male or female, may lawfully consent to buggery (an offence which does not exist in Scotland) and certain homosexual acts. This reduction is from 18 to 16 in England and Wales and Scotland, and from 18 to 17 in Northern Ireland. This equalises the age of consent for sexual activity so that it is the same for male homosexuals as for heterosexuals and lesbians ie 16 in England, Wales and Scotland and 17 in Northern Ireland. Second, in all jurisdictions, a person under the age of consent no longer commits an offence themselves if they engage in buggery (not Scotland) or certain homosexual acts with a person over the age of consent.

Also interesting is that they have a "position of trust" thingy which means that if you're over 18 and in a position of trust over someone who's 17, you're a sex offender. Does the US have anything like that?


Matt the Bruins fan - Nov 21, 2005 8:08:30 am PST #8740 of 10002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

The info I'd read must have been out of date then... it seemed to indicate that over 20s and under 18s would involve criminal prosecution of the older party.


Mr. Broom - Nov 21, 2005 8:08:44 am PST #8741 of 10002
"When I look at people that I would like to feel have been a mentor or an inspiring kind of archetype of what I'd love to see my career eventually be mentioned as a footnote for in the same paragraph, it would be, like, Bowie." ~Trent Reznor

Ah. Well, I can't say the world doesn't need more duelling magicians. The more the merrier.
Well, Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell has been optioned as a film, so wishes just may be horses in this case. Of course, if "The Prestige" really takes off, a movie about dueling magicians who use real magic a couple years later (set a hundred years earlier) may cause some amusing confusion for audiences.


§ ita § - Nov 21, 2005 8:09:12 am PST #8742 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The info I'd read must have been out of date then.

Unless something changed and changed back between the 80s and now, it was very out of date.