I also really want to see The Island.
It's scary.
'Touched'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I also really want to see The Island.
It's scary.
I saw an ad for The Island for the first time this morning, and had to god I thought it was a remake of Logan's Run until the title card came along. (I believe there is a remake of Logan's Run in the works, anyway, so the hot-iggerant-babes-dystopia genre seems to be having quite the revival.)
This morning I watched Strangers on a Train. How did I not know that the classic shot of "everybody in the audience look that way, except for the one creepy person in the middle who keeps looking at you" comes from this movie? How did I not know that the denouement involved a carousel gone berserk? If I had known, the movie would have been higher on the Netflix queue.
I'll say this for Hitchcock: his psychology may often have been overwrought cockamamie, but he knew how to come up with an interesting new visual.
I love Strangers on a Train. Tit for tat.
Hee. From Salon's review of "Unleashed":
But director Louis Leterrier trusts Li to carry the moment, and he does, inventing a wholly new type of character: He's the first Dickensian orphan action star.
"Please, sir, may I kill some more?"
How did I not know that the classic shot of "everybody in the audience look that way, except for the one creepy person in the middle who keeps looking at you" comes from this movie?
I think of that as a Felllini thing.
I saw an ad for The Island for the first time this morning, and had to god I thought it was a remake of Logan's Run until the title card came along.
I'm still not convinced it isn't.
I'll say this for Hitchcock: his psychology may often have been overwrought cockamamie, but he knew how to come up with an interesting new visual.
I think the key to understanding Hitchcock is that the psychology was there only to get to the next interesting visual. Hitchcock came up with the set pieces - it was the writer's job to join the dots. Sometimes it worked out better than others, but oh those dots.
My one film class was on Hitchcock. I definitely remember the images and feelings much more than the McGuffins for most of the films.
So, I saw Episode III yesterday. I enjoyed it. Best of the prequels, still not as good as the originals, IMO.
However, the big letdown for me was Darth Vader lurching around screaming "NOOOOOOOO!" which seemed incredibly cheesy and ruined what should have been a dramatic highpoint.
I sqw III yesterday, too. Like you, I liked it more than the other two prequels, but I still thought the dialogiue was cliched and wooden, and Hayden Christenson SUCKED.
Loved the four arms with four light sabers of General Grevious. Very cool.